amphitheater's forum posts
So now being pregnant is a liability and loss to businesses? Come on, who cares if their pregnant? If they can do the job right, then that won't be a liability as opposed to someone who can't get pregnant who has no production.[QUOTE="amphitheater"][QUOTE="poptart"]
No, but if you're a small business and 3 female employees get pregnant then that can be very damaging. I'm not saying I agree with it, but you can see from a small business owners perspective wanting to protect his bottom line.
poptart
Alas it's true.
Let's rewind, say, 5 years when the economy was solid and there's a deep skills shortage. If you're a business with 6 employees; 2 of whom are on the cusp of taking a year off then it may be extremely hard to replace/fill in during their absence. That's the reality of it unfortunately. If you're a business owner and you're interviewing a 28 year old girl getting married in 6 months, it may well factor into your decision making process. It does happen.
Sir, that situation you have is unfortunate. Why did you grant your 2 employees to take a year off at the same time span? And also, the girl is only getting married, didn't say she is getting pregnant or already is pregnant....and they are a protected group. You can't put a sign outside that says Women need not apply. Just because women as a group are more likely to get pregnant than men does not mean you can disregard the individual woman.[QUOTE="EntropyWins"][QUOTE="poptart"]
They're obviously more prone to requiing time off then.
poptart
No, but if you're a small business and 3 female employees get pregnant then that can be very damaging. I'm not saying I agree with it, but you can see from a small business owners perspective wanting to protect his bottom line.
So now being pregnant is a liability and loss to businesses? Come on, who cares if they're pregnant? If they can do the job right, then that won't be a liability as opposed to someone who can't get pregnant who has no production.
Log in to comment