Maybe they mean the three days to be the rest of friday, all of saturday, and into sunday, so that it spanned 3 days.bluezy

[QUOTE="bastards12345"]

The myth goes that Jesus died on the cross at around midday on Friday and rose from the dead three days later. Since when does that mean he was resurrected the following Sunday?

I say, quite the predicament.

andyandy1

It says that he rose on the third day so that actually means that he was dead for 48 hours and on the next 24 hours he rose.

[QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="sinarilias"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="flavort"]I think it is a bunch of junkflavort

sure in the 70's the scientist that you may think are so perfect, were talking about global cooling. Well it was supposed to ruin all of the crops and create a disaster. What ever happened to that? They were positive about this. The scientist claimed this past year was going to be blasted by hurricanes. Still not true. Scientist after so many years figured out that Pluto was not a planet, nothing to do with global warming but their accuracy. A weather cant even predict weather for a week so how can they predict the future?

I explained my usage of pluto in my post, pay attention. I dont have anything against scientist but science is not always certian and changes. There are plenty of scientist that think global warming is not a issue. Not man made and not a threat.

So it was the definition that was inaccurate? Who came up with the definition?

why would you change it if it was not right in the first place?

[QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="flavort"]

So it was the definition that was inaccurate? Who came up with the definition?

quiglythegreat

it has nothing to do with global warming

[QUOTE="bastards12345"][QUOTE="flavort"][QUOTE="sinarilias"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="flavort"]I think it is a bunch of junkflavort

sure in the 70's the scientist that you may think are so perfect, were talking about global cooling. Well it was supposed to ruin all of the crops and create a disaster. What ever happened to that? They were positive about this. The scientist claimed this past year was going to be blasted by hurricanes. Still not true. Scientist after so many years figured out that Pluto was not a planet, nothing to do with global warming but their accuracy. A weather cant even predict weather for a week so how can they predict the future?

I explained my usage of pluto in my post, pay attention. I dont have anything against scientist but science is not always certian and changes. There are plenty of scientist that think global warming is not a issue. Not man made and not a threat.

So it was the definition that was inaccurate? Who came up with the definition?

The myth goes that Jesus died on the cross at around midday on Friday and rose from the dead three days later. Since when does that mean he was resurrected the following Sunday?

I say, quite the predicament.

[QUOTE="sinarilias"][QUOTE="flavort"]

[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="flavort"]I think it is a bunch of junkflavort

sure in the 70's the scientist that you may think are so perfect, were talking about global cooling. Well it was supposed to ruin all of the crops and create a disaster. What ever happened to that? They were positive about this. The scientist claimed this past year was going to be blasted by hurricanes. Still not true. Scientist after so many years figured out that Pluto was not a planet, nothing to do with global warming but their accuracy. A weather cant even predict weather for a week so how can they predict the future?

I explained my usage of pluto in my post, pay attention. I dont have anything against scientist but science is not always certian and changes. There are plenty of scientist that think global warming is not a issue. Not man made and not a threat.