@systemoverload:
Blame nVidia, the card alone is roughly 1/3rd the total cost.

@phili878:

My failed attempt at sarcasm since GS decided to dig up some useless info on a 25 year old movie.

I did like him Mrs Doubtfire, that's about it though. Watched it on a flight somewhere, safe airplane flick.

Pierce Brosnan?...Who Dat?

Nice sneakers for the Fall with some Loose Fit or Bootcut jeans...none of that feminine skinny crap. $220 bucks for a pair of sneakers though?....I think not.

Utterly useless, GameStop closed statewide here...peak infection rate time.

What about a Frilled Shark?...got any of those?

How about adding "Map Voting", Its been around since 1999 or so.

Man...I'm thrilled to not be in the Apple Eco-System, stuff is seriously overpriced.

I had a Macbook Pro at my old job that I really liked it, but I would never come out the pocket for one, not for the prices they are asking.

@bbq_R0ADK1LL:

This is a remake of a game...a story for which most of us already know. Not an adaptation of a book most will never read.

This not a movie saga that was originally released in 1977. How many Gamespot visitors were even born in 1977?

The original FF7 released 23 years ago. There is absolutely, positively no valid reason I will accept for releasing the game in parts.

You also never answered my original question... "If standard releases were released in parts, could one of those parts be worthy of a 10?"

This is not a new IP to the screen like GoT or Star Wars was at the time of release.

GS is really in defense mode with this recent 10 spot it seems.

If standard releases were released in parts, could one of those parts be worthy of a 10?...it is a slippery slope.

Personally, I don't think any one part of these FF7 releases should be eligible for a 10. Give the final score once all the parts have been released.

I'm personally not purchasing any of these "parts" until they are all available.

You guys issued a 10 for a game where its entirety will be released in parts, its done...move on.