[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"]and ? has anyone announced this for 360 ? i never saw a 360 sign at the end of the trailer. why do you lemmings want our games so badly :lol: and we dont give a crud about ur games LOLDaysAirlines

[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="tricyclon123"]

I did not see that coming to be frank, but after the HUGE downgrade, they had to say something i suppose

http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t=509144

http://playstar.cinebb.com/Dossiers-f4/Rencontre-avec-Christophe-Balestra-de-Naughty-Dog-t210.htm

Ok guys, here is a translation:
The E3 teaser wasn't realtime apparently, but was using the assets and shaders of the game at that time, but the engine wasn't good enough. Today they have it running at 30 fps, and they are very near the trailer quality, about 90% of it (litteraly says it's missing 10%), because the shaders have been downgraded a bit because they aimed too high at first.

It also mentions they are using Nvidia's CG, but also some new library that has not been made available to third party devs yet.

....

That article is 100% legit. Believe it or not it's your problem, but the author is well known here in France, and the event itself happened for sure.tricyclon123

Their engine was not good enough = PS3 weak?

Wait, this is good news, they are 90% near the trailer quality, given how much time they still have left before the release I don't see why they couldn't take it all the way.

Too much damage control in this thread ....

If PS3 was the god like machine they promised, and any of those pics of games was real, now they would not have to excuse themselves, right ?

But fact is not one game on PS3 did not get the downgrade, seems like EVERY DEVELOPER overestimated what PS3 can do, so that is why all first pics - videos of games are 100% fakes

You have NO CLUE man, engines run off HARDWARE, they are not an idea, it is an implementation, they used a super pc for the first pics, but turned PS3 is far far weaker, that is all there is to it

As for the .. 90% figure, they are the devlopers, they would make THE best damage control possible, but fact is that it is more than 40% downgraded, lighting seems nowhere near, shaders too, AA too, how is all that ...10% ???

Where is the logic, when you suggest they had an engine that .... did not run in hardware ?

As for developers .... exclusive on PS3 ones .... suggesting PS3 will be better in 1-2 years, i will just not take their word for anything

$600 is $600.....it's not just hard on kids.

No responsible adult should waste their hard earned money on a $600 grill.

Let's say they cut the cost of a Mercedes from $100,000 to $60,000. I still wouldn't have $60,000, despite the discount.
Two400

[QUOTE="AvatarAko"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"][QUOTE="AvatarAko"][QUOTE="Puckhog04"]

[QUOTE="AvatarAko"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]And yet, despite being 'so well planned', PS3 had terrible BC compatibility and quality issues at launch, it's online service is basically a pale shadow of XBL and it didn't managed to combine rumble and motion sensing like the Wii did.Puckhog04

1. We don't need the previous generation games. :wink:

2. No, PSN is not equivalent to XBL. I'm sorry you can't afford $50 a year for XBL, but that's the way it is. It's the better online service by a mile.

XBL > PSN.

Cry me a river, either that or stop talking. You're only looking worse and worse.

I pay for the best online service...if PS3's online service were up to XBL i'd pay for that as well. Free is the only way? You know what, that's an excuse that is being used in situation to help your argument. That's about the only argument you people have with XBL because it's essentially got an incredibly short list of gripes.

1. Free online isn't necessarily better.

2. I've played my 360 for over 10 hours straight, numerous times, while trying to get the survival mode achievements in Dead Rising. Never has overheated, in fact, i've never had a single problem with my launch Xbox 360. So please, stop with the stupid fanboy hardware comments, they make you look ridiculous. No, i've never played any game on any platform for 23 hours a day and your comment about that is one of the most unrealistic things i've ever heard on System Wars.

3. Umm...if i have a life? You're criticizing me about not having a life when you are on a videogame forum speaking about videogames? What, do you think we get awards for talking about these things? Some inhert satisfaction? Please, your arguments are laughable.

4. $50 too much for you? Like i said, if PSN offered what XBL did (or more) i'd easily pay $50 a year to use it. I'm sorry if i have disposable income. I have money i can spend.