Forum Posts Following Followers
24508 2805 1399

biggest_loser Blog

Gran Torino - Film Review - Comment it!

We meet Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood), a racist Korean War veteran, living in the suburbs of Detroit, at his wife's funeral. We discover that he is a cranky and grizzled senior, with contempt for his own selfish family, including his sons and their spoilt children. Living next door to Walt is an Asian-American family, including most significantly a young boy named Thao (Bee Vang), who is being harassed by his street gang cousins. The gang attempts to initiate Thao by trying to steal Walt's prized 1972 Gran Torino car from his garage. Walt catches Thao and holds him in great contempt. Yet when he saves Thao's life from the gang one evening he is thanked by the family next door and welcomed into their home.

Gran Torino represents Clint Eastwood's best efforts to shift between humour and drama with emotional punch, as few other directors would attempt. While many assumed that Gran Torino was a pseudo-sequel to the Dirty Harry films, Clint Eastwood has again distanced himself significantly from his iconic character. Both Harry Callaghan and Walt are collectively enforcers and all round tough guys, but this is largely where the similarities end. Rather, Walt - as war veteran and a patriot - remains a contrast to the way in which society has degraded its morals and its values. He is tired and angry with youths – like his grandchildren - are rude and uncaring. Even Walt's own children remain grovelling, selfish and patronising. They wish to send him to a retirement village at one stage in the film.

Eastwood, now reaching his early eighties himself, brings believability to the frailty of this old man at the end of his life. He injects the character with humour through his deadpan and raspy voice, as well his ferocious snarls and growls. It is familiar territory for Eastwood to be playing a cranky old mentor who has seen it all, not too dissimilar to the character he played in Million Dollar Baby (he even argues with a priest here). Yet Walt is more obnoxious and more fearless and uncompromising in his approach to people. It is perhaps a more difficult character because of how unlikable he should be. But Eastwood remains in scintillating form here and is still one of Hollywood's coolest customers. The humour of the film, courtesy of both the script and Eastwood's delivery, makes it difficult to dismiss Walt entirely, despite his prejudices. Walt's wit makes him more tolerable to watch on screen and many of the laughs throughout the film are derived from how blunt and rude he is. Without this humour the character Walt may not have been as likeable or given the audience much reason to care about what he does. Similarly, from the beginning of the film as well, it is easy to evoke sympathy and understand why Walt is so grizzled and cranky, given the death of his wife and the selfishness of the people around him. The script has been very smartly thought out and written here.

It is with this slightly lighter tone that the film is never quite as heavy as Million Dollar Baby or Mystic River. Granted there is still an explosive and emotional climax. Although, it is certainly not the one that Dirty Harry enthusiasts would be expecting. Further removing the film from Dirty Harry saga is also the redemptive qualities of Eastwood's character. Walt, having been so removed from his family, finds that he can still connect with the Asian family next door, in particular Thao, who he acts as a teacher and role model to. Thankfully though, these scenes, like in Eastwood's other films, avoid sentimentality entirely. The Australian movie magazine Empire criticised the film for Walt's transition being too sudden, but there are efforts in the film and its script that ensure it remains credible. Despite the changes in Walt, his characterisation remains highly consistent. He is still grizzled and sceptical about the people he begins to mingle with. Yet it is not beyond him to see the good in people, regardless of their nationality, as he says to himself: 'I have more in common with these **** than my own spoiled, rotten family.' The growth here, and perhaps to an extent the redemption, is what separates Eastwood's character from Harry Callaghan again. It is this change as Walt reconnects with people, in particular the young boy, which provides the film with its narrative direction and growth. Had it been expanded and drawn out, rather than compressed as it is, it may not have been as engaging.

Gran Torino may not have the poignancy of Million Dollar Baby or the confrontation of Mystic River, yet it is still such an engaging and often very funny film because of the central performance by Eastwood. There is little doubt that he is still one of Hollywood's strongest talents. It is his film and he dominates it with a performance that shows humour, anger and occasionally guilt. As a director, nearing the end of his career, Gran Torino remains an expression of Eastwood's maturity and skill to deal with such large and universal ideas, like the tolerance of culture. Gran Torino will make your day.

Valkyrie - Film Review

Operation Valkyrie was a top secret mission during the Second World War to eliminate the Fuhrer and in the wake of his death, prevent the SS from taking power. It was conducted by a German officer Claus Von Stauffenberg (played in the film by Tom Cruise), who witnessed and was appalled by the mistreatment of prisoners and the destruction delivered by the wrath of the Reich. The film begins in North Africa when Stauffenberg is badly wounded in an attack where he loses one of his hands and the use of one of his eyes too. After he recovers in hospital back in Berlin, he is enlisted by a group of German officers who are looking to devise a new plan to kill Adolf Hitler.

Bryan Singer has crafted a very intensive World War II drama that shows his diversity as a director, following his efforts on the X-Men films and more recently, Superman Returns (2006). During its production Valkyrie followed great controversy in Germany, with great antipathy towards the casting of Cruise because of his alliance with Scientology. Many have been critical of his performance, labelling him as unconvincing, given that he does not speak German throughout the film and does not even adopt a German accent. There is little change to his voice throughout the film. However, Cruise still looks startlingly similar to Stauffenberg and Singer has been quick to defend his casting of Cruise as he believed that collectively the actor and Stauffenberg both shared great charisma. In spite of this, Cruise seems more restrained here and does not display the same flamboyancy or mannerisms, like his cocky grin and snappy one-liners that many have grown accustomed to in his previous films. Rather he exudes the passion of Stauffenberg to protect his country and his family, not through an extensive level of emotion, but through the intensity of his voice as he delivers his lines. It displays the motives and will of Stauffenberg with a strong focus and determination. He knows the risk to himself and his wife and children, but is willing to risk everything for the chance to end the war. Though it is not the usual showy performance that many would expect from the actor, it still remains a solid one at that.

Equally impressive is the sustainability of the tension throughout the film. It is testimony to the direction of Singer that the film is so exciting, despite the known outcome. The second half in particular is crafted with moments of brilliance, such as when Stauffenberg must put the final touches of a bomb together with his only hand, as a Nazi waits outside the room, urging him to hurry up. The final moments before the bomb itself detonates are heart racing too. Critics have been quick to dismiss the film because the majority of the cast – many of whom are English (such as the excellent Bill Nighy) - do not speak German. It is naive to dismiss the film entirely because it is not authentic towards the dialect. It still tells the story with such tension that it does particularly matter what language the characters speak in, but what they say and what they do throughout the film. It is for this reason that Valkyrie still remains as fine entertainment.

While Singer does not hold back in showing the brutal executions of the members of the operation, there remains a distance between the audience and the end of the film. It does not quite have the emotional impact that it could have. Perhaps it is because much of the operation is already known and has been studied. Regardless though, the suspense of Valkyrie remains for much of the films running time and there are moments where it appears to be heading so swimmingly, leaving one to ask how it went so horribly wrong. There is also a significant and timely message to take away from the film about the choices that decent human beings can make, even in the face of suppression and the overwhelming odds of evil.

Valkyrie has survived its controversy and cynical critics to be recognised as a suspenseful and skilfully made thriller. It has been authentically decorated and purposefully acted by its entire cast. If audiences give the film a chance and look beyond the stardom of Cruise and see the subtlety of his performance, they will be rewarded with an interesting and intense film about one of history's most ambitious failures.

Top Oscar Nominations and Predictions.

Nominations

Best Motion Picture of the Year

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 ): Ceán Chaffin, Kathleen Kennedy, Frank Marshall

Frost/Nixon (2008 ): Brian Grazer, Ron Howard, Eric Fellner

Milk (2008 ): Bruce Cohen, Dan Jinks

The Reader (2008 ): Nominees to be determined

Slumdog Millionaire (2008 ): Christian Colson

Who Will Win:

Slumdog Millionaire.

Who Should Win:

The snubbing of The Dark Knight for Best Picture is a disgrace and a black eye to both Christopher Nolan and the enormous fanbase of this terrific film. It stands at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, well ahead of The Reader at 60%. Having said all that, Slumdog Millionaire, from those nominations deserves to win and it will.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role

Nominees:

Richard Jenkins for The Visitor (2007/I)

Frank Langella for Frost/Nixon (2008 )

Sean Penn for Milk (2008 )

Brad Pitt for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 )

Mickey Rourke for The Wrestler (2008 )

Who Will Win:

Mickey Rourke.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role

Nominees:

Anne Hathaway for Rachel Getting Married (2008 )

Angelina Jolie for Changeling (2008 )

Melissa Leo for Frozen River (2008 )

Meryl Streep for Doubt (2008/I)

Kate Winslet for The Reader (2008 )

Who Will Win:

Kate Winslet. Though an upset for Jolie is possible.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role

Nominees:

Josh Brolin for Milk (2008 )

Robert Downey Jr. for Tropic Thunder (2008 )

Philip Seymour Hoffman for Doubt (2008/I )

Heath Ledger for The Dark Knight (2008 )

Michael Shannon for Revolutionary Road (2008 )

Who Will Win:

Heath Ledger to become only the second deceased person to take a gong. Its not about sympathy, its about an amazing performance. And for all the cynics who say that its just about his tragic death, rent Two Hands and you will see how much he has transformed himself into one of the best villains in cinematic history.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role

Nominees:

Amy Adams for Doubt (2008/I)

Penélope Cruz for Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008 )

Viola Davis for Doubt (2008/I)

Taraji P. Henson for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 )

Marisa Tomei for The Wrestler (2008 )

Who Will Win:

I have absolutely no idea on this one lol.

I have a suscipion that Cruz could win. She probably has the most 'hype' and thus momentum about her role - granted she was only in the last third of the movie.

Best Achievement in Directing

Nominees:

Danny Boyle for Slumdog Millionaire (2008 )

Stephen Daldry for The Reader (2008 )

David Fincher for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 )

Ron Howard for Frost/Nixon (2008 )

Gus Van Sant for Milk (2008 )

Who Will Win:

Danny Boyle for Slumdog. Picture and director usually go together.

Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen

Nominees:

Frozen River (2008 ): Courtney Hunt

Happy-Go-Lucky (2008 ): Mike Leigh

In Bruges (2008 ): Martin McDonagh

Milk (2008 ): Dustin Lance Black

WALL·E (2008 ): Andrew Stanton

Who Will Win:

Milk probably. Can't wait for it to be released here in Oz.

Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published

Nominees:

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008 ): Eric Roth, Robin Swicord

Doubt (2008/I): John Patrick Shanley

Frost/Nixon (2008 ): Peter Morgan

The Reader (2008 ): David Hare

Slumdog Millionaire (2008 ): Simon Beaufoy

Who Will Win:

Slumdog Millionaire.

The Films I've watched This Week - From January 6th -

Here are some of the movies I have watched this week:

Vicky Cristina Barcelona:

82% Rotten Tomatoes

Youtube Trailer

An ol' school romantic comedy from Woody Allen. Not laugh out loud funny as it probably could have been, but seeing this movie is like going on a holiday. Some of it looks beautiful and there's some fun characters to meet. Jarvier Bardem is great in it, as is Rebecca Hall

You can check out my review here if you haven't read it.

The Black Balloon:

95% Rotten Tomatoes

Youtube Trailer

This was a terrific Australian film I watched on DVD. It is about a boy who moves to a new neighbourhood his family, including his autistic brother, who makes his life very stressful, especially in social situations, when he is trying a court a girl at his school. Some of it is very funny but there are also some really intense scenes that are still resonating with me.

This movie blows The Castle out of the water in terms its realistic depiction of the workings on an Australian household and the chaos associated with that.

Lars and The Real Girl:

81% Rotten Tomatoes

Youtube Trailer

This is about a guy who orders a doll named Bianca and acts as though he is in a relationship with her. He takes her everywhere and at one stage he tells people in the town that he proposed to her!

Ryan Gosling is great in this film as the weird and awkward loner, but it just becomes so improbable and silly with the way the town takes this doll in as a real person.

There is a scene where Gosling's character says the doll is ill and then she is taken into a hospital bed via an ambulance. Its just too improbable.

Wanted:

73% Rotten Tomatoes

Youtube Trailer

DUMB. Its just dumb. A group of assassins working in a textile factory. Their missions are told to them via a loom...

There's a scene where a woman drives a car into a moving train...

In all fairness the movie starts off well, theres some humerous lines in James Macovys voice over and some funny office scenes and cool visual tricks. But by the second hour of the film it just becomes increasingly silly and just DUMB. The actors, especially Angelina Jolie and Morgan Freeman are underused.

Coming Up Next...

Taken

50% Rotten Tomatoes

I might be watching Taken - with Liam Neeson on DVD. Like literally with him. He's coming over to watch it with me. So I hope its good.

Then on Sunday I am going to see Yes Man - Jim Carrey's new film. I won a double pass to that, so expect a review for it too.

UPDATE: Just finished watching Taken. It was pretty poor. These revenge films have been done so many times so there weren't many twists in the story at all. And I'm not really a fan of electrical torture. The whole "rich, white American girl" getting kidnapped is a little too shallow for my liking. Liam's performance deserved a better movie.

Vicky Cristina Barcelona

A young woman named Vicky (Rebecca Hall) and her best friend Cristina (Scarlet Johansen) stay with a relative in Barcelona together. One evening at dinner the women are approached by a Spanish artist named Juan Antonio (Javier Bardem), who invites them to his home in the city of Oviedo. Vicky is highly skeptical of the man's forwardness, but Cristina is immediately taken by the man's charm. Both the women eventually take up Antonio's offer and stay with him. They are gradually won over by his and his knowledge of Spain as well as the culture that they have rarely experienced in their lives.

Amongst the recent surge of stoner comedies and grotesque toilet humour, director Woody Allen has made a light and old-fashioned romantic-comedy for adults. Given that given that many of Allen's previous films have covered similar territory Vicky Cristina Barcelona does not say anything new or deep. Yet it is still a light and fun film with a simple message. There is a definite notion of exploring the alternative and throughout the film culture is thoroughly amplified through the beautiful photography of the Spanish countryside and the discussion of both art and photography. Disappointingly, although many have labeled the film as a comedy, there are not as many consistently hilarious moments or funny lines of dialogue as some might expect. Rather, the engagement of the film is held by its cast, most of which is impressive.

The way both women are introduced in such a contrasting way is both funny and clever. Scarlett Johansson is radiant as Cristina. Yet strangely the script doesn't provide her with more scenes to allow her to consistently portray her character as impulsive and daring. It is a shame that Johansson wasn't given a more interesting character. She needed more to do in the film. Rebecca Hall is a lot more consistent in her characterisation as the reluctant Vicky, and through her voice she acutely displays her reluctance and tentative nature. Vicky's engagement to a dull American yuppie, who frequently calls her babe, also creates drama and dilemmas for her, and makes her scenes in the film more interesting and entertaining. Javier Bardem – who improvised numerous parts of his dialogue – has removed memories of his psychotic and wholly iconic character from No Country For Old Men. He is again convincing as the intelligent, kind and charming Antonio. While Penelope Cruz – who also improvised some of her Spanish lines with Bardem - has a lot of fun with her role as Antonio's crazy and dangerous ex-wife, but she does not come into the film till later on and only has relatively a small role.

The film suffers from a very intrusive and overly used voice over, explaining scenes that are unfolding right before the audience. Sometimes it gives a small detail that we wouldn't have known otherwise, but most of the time it's just annoying and unnecessary. Why a writer and director with the experience of Allen would use this is a mystery. Also, towards the end of the film there are certain moments that just don't ring true and seem too easy for the characters to accept and partake in. It as though the film wanted to reach for much darker territory. It is difficult to elaborate on without spoiling the plot of the film.

Vicky Cristina Barcelona is a very light film. There is a great deal of fun to be had with some of the characters and the decisions and choices they are faced with. It's just not as hilarious enough to be regarded as a comedy and probably too light and familiar in its examination of love and relationships to be anything entirely memorable. Fans of Woody Allen may have to wait a little longer for a complete return to form for the director, but this film could well be a step in the right direction.

3/5

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Film Review

A woman who is on her deathbed in hospital asks her daughter to read to her a diary she has held for many years of her life. The diary details the life of Benjamin Button (Brad Pitt), who was born after the end of the First World War in New Orleans. Given that he was born old and looked horribly deformed, he was abandoned on the doorsteps of a nursing home by his father and his mother died in childbirth. Amongst the elderly residents Benjamin is raised in the home by an African American woman named Queenie (Taraji P. Henson). He also meets a range of colourful fairytale-like characters throughout the adventures and episodes of his life. One of the most significant relationships Benjamin develops is with a ballet dancer, Daisy (Cate Blanchett), who met Benjamin in her youth. Their relationship develops late in the film as he finds her living in New York, as she grows older, but he becomes gradually younger.

Despite being based on a short story written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1921, it is difficult to view The Curious Case of Benjamin Button without reminiscing films like Forrest Gump and Big Fish. Each of these films presented a fable-like story of an innocent character whose journey through life is filled with unusual and sometimes dangerous adventures, which allowed them to reflect on their existence in the world, as they met a range of unusual characters, most importantly a woman who forms a significant and emotional part of their lives. While Forrest Gump relegated itself to both satire and sentimentality, Benjamin Button, despite an air of familiarity (the screenplay was written by Eric Roth who also composed the script for Forrest Gump), is a much intelligent and complex variant on the fantasy genre, because of the questions its raises about age, time and death.

Unlike Forrest Gump and Big Fish though, there is considerably less time is spent with many of the strange oddball characters that Benjamin meets in his life. Those that Button meets are fun – like a brittle English woman in a hotel, a tugboat sailor covered in tattoos, or a small Blackman who lived in a zoo - but they are never as defined or as particularly well known as in those previous two films. Yet this is precisely the point and one of the key themes in the film, that nature and the unpredictable course of life will always ensure that people can come and go from one's life and have significant or little impact on who they become.

These notions are further emphasised by a number of anecdotes and red herring's throughout the film, like the man who insists he has been struck by lightning seven times. With each recollection of this, the film cuts to grainy, silent footage where we see him struck by lightning. While indeed humorous, perhaps this is a more significant amplification and reinforcement of the theme of nature and time and the way that it can interfere with one's life. No matter what one chooses to do or who they meet, or where they go, there are always going to be factors that are out of our control and will impact on one's life. These anecdotes and the way they construct the ideas of time and age reinforce the fairytale-like qualities of the film and contribute a brand of sweetness that allows it to be both fun to watch and also academic in the questions it raises.

The centrepiece of the film is a very strong performance by Brad Pitt, who is aided immeasurably by excellent makeup to play both the elderly Benjamin and the younger man too. As he grows younger it becomes a more still performance, one that isn't particularly showy, but one that is just very likeable. His narration – despite its familiarity – is poignant throughout the film and really captures the feel that we are being read a story – perhaps a compliment to Fitzgerald's short story. Tilda Swinton has a fairly brief role as a brittle Englishman in Russia, while Blanchett has a much larger part as the older Daisy – but both women are very competent in their roles, looking eerily similar at times.

The final third of the film gives much more time to Blanchett's character and the relationship between herself and Button. As they move into their duplex together and talk about having a child the fairytale fable elements of the rest of the film seem very distant, as though the film is almost grounded in a brand of realism at last. It is this final third of the film that really feels overlong and tends at times though.

At approximately 160 minutes you really begin to feel the time. Yet it is still a very beautiful film to watch though, as director David Fincher has crafted a film that is very handsomely made, with particular care being placed in the art direction and set designs – the tug boat scenes are particularly impressive. There are familiar elements with the film and it is imperfect, but there are so things to enjoy about it and much to question that remains a very watchable and likeable film to enjoy.

4/5.

Twilight - Film Review.

Based on Stephanie Meyer's vampire novel, Twilight centres on Bella Swan (Kirsten Stewart), a young teenage girl who has had to move back to a town called Forks, following her parents' separation. She attends a new school and is quickly engaged by another student named Edward Cullen. He is very cold towards her and seemingly aggressive with his hard stares. When Edward saves Bella from a car accident she becomes determined – much to his distress – to find out who he is. She remains unafraid of him and eventually they form a unique relationship.

Twilight seems like a fitting continuation of director Catherine Hardwicke's career. Two of her previous films were Thirteen and Lords of Dogtown, which were also movies about young teenagers. Fortunately for fans of the vampire novel, Hardwicke has done a considerable job in her adaptation, showing high fidelity to Stephanie Meyer's novel. Many of the scenes between the novel and the film are the same and some of the dialogue has been kept intact too. The film was shot in both California and Washington and as a result the town of Forks looks both suitably damp and dark throughout. Details such as this – as well as the consistent characterisation of many side personalities from the novel – will please fans with Hardwicke's faithfulness and respect to the source material. As a visualisation of Meyer's work the film provides an atmosphere and an poignancy at times only possible in this medium.

Kirsten Stewart and Robert Pattinson are quite competent as Bella and Edward, without ever being brilliant. Stewart is seemingly fragile and occasionally clumsy, as Bella should be. One may suggest that Bella's engagement with Edward is a result of her cold relationship with her father and the absence of her mother. She needs someone to love her, no matter who or what they might be. Pattinson is not quite as charming as one would imagine Edward to be though. Instead he plays him as rather weird, awkward and angrier in the early scenes. His staring is somewhat silly but at the same it's almost intentionally comical. At least the film is absent of Meyer's tiring and repetitive attempts to place Edward on a pedestal because of his looks. Much has been made of the supposed poor acting by other critics. Regardless of what one might think though, there is no denying that they are both very beautiful and in their likeness they look very well suited together. There is a real sweetness and tender poignancy offered by the beautiful leads that wasn't as effective in the novel.

Some have also criticised the film for the relationship being too sudden and too spontaneous. Yet to understand and be immersed in their passion it is advisable to read the novel the first. There is more description of Edwards hunger and thirst as a vampire and his frustration at not being able to ignore Bella's interest. In this regard, both the novel and the film act as companion pieces, allowing you to see perspectives and different interpretations of this same story.

Both the film and the novel have their own strengths and weaknesses because of their mediums. The structure of the story seems to be paced more effectively in the film though and less naive. Almost half of the novel is devoted to Bella guessing about what Edward is, when we obviously know he is a vampire. In the film however, this is accelerated to move to move to the crux of the story. There is also a much more visceral and action packed climax than what the novel offers - which will certainly please fans - and a lovely moment where Edward gracefully plays the piano.

Cynics may detest the seemingly clichéd premise and simple love story. Granted some of it may seem slightly silly – the doctor looks far too young and good looking - but it's all purely fictional and it is a film aimed particularly at those who loved the novel. They will be very pleased with the way in which Hardwicke has visualised many of the key moments from the novel and provided them with both poignancy and romanticism.

3.5/5.

Slumdog Millionaire - Film Review

A young Indian boy named Jamal Malik (Dev Patel) finds himself as a contestant on the game show Who wants to Be a Millionaire? He has placed himself on the show because he knows that the girl he has loved for much of his life will be watching. Through flashback we see how he grew up on the poverty stricken streets of India and how he became knowledgeable about many of the questions on the show through his life experiences Intertwined with these scenes is his interrogation with the police, as he is accused of possibly cheating on the game show. We must ask whether he cheated, whether he is lucky, or whether it might just be his destiny to win.

Danny Boyle, whose previous films include the horror film 28 Days Later and science fiction drama Sunshine, has shown his creativity and diversity towards filmmaking, with this poignant and intense coming of age story. Much of the film takes place in the past as we learn how Jamal grew up on the streets of India. These episodes are entertaining, intense and often very informative about the lifest*le and culture of India. We see how Jamal and his brother grew up together, mostly alone after their mother was killed in a viscous racial attack, and how they managed to stay alive through theft and begging for money on the streets. The way we see how money, as well as weaponry, changes a person's authority, status and attitude to life, is powerfully explored later in the film too, particularly through Jamal's brother, Salim.

There is also a very disturbing moment in this film where we learn that blind beggars often make more money than the ones that can see. Given the way that scenes like this and others are staged and purposefully photographed, the film is wrapped in a high level of authenticity and verisimilitude. It was shot on location in Mumbai and Maharashtra in India and the crowded streets, culture and people, all have an air of believability about them. Yet this is juxtaposed with Boyle's rapid cutting and fast paced film st*le, which gives the film a fantasy and almost dream-like quality to represent destiny, as Jamal moves closer towards his conquest of the game show. It is a very smartly constructed film.

Dev Patel as Jamal – with his boyish face and innocent face - is a very shy, quiet but ultimately likeable lead. He looks suitably nervous in the game show sequences, as he is intimidated by the host, who plays a game of cat and mouse with him. Yet from the previous moments of his life we know that Jamal is a very tough and daring person, much more than what is presented through the falsity and phoniness of the game show. Even in their early stages many of these game show scenes are surprisingly intense, despite the fact that we know from the beginning how far Jamal will reach. One could criticise the film for being contrived, in that the questions all relate to something that has happened in his life. Yet since the theme of destiny plays so thoroughly throughout and that it is indeed a crowd pleasing and warm film, it is excusable.

Slumdog Millionaire is a tremendously exciting and well acted film. The progression of its story and the way it unfolds under Boyle's direction ensures that this is much more intense and engrossing film than many of the Hollywood blockbusters released this year. It is poignant at times and brutal at other moments. At the core of the film though, is a simple message about taking chances and rising above the odds of life, no matter where you started from in the world. Slumdog Millionaire - like its protagonist – is a real winner.

4.5/5.