@og_gamerzzz: The last bastion of the imagination....really dude? lol. You're talking about the constriction of art and freedom of expression. The reviews have spoken about the fact that the game doesn't explore its subjects enough, which is the very pillar of art that you would like to defend.
I don't understand why Polygon decided to go with two write-ups from different authors:
Pre-Review:
"Call of Duty: WWII’s campaign has to serve many different masters, and that tension often feels like it may overwhelm the story’s goals. The campaign’s tone shifts around a bit too much, but the entire experience provides a surprisingly varied and enjoyable look at a war that has been pored over by every aspect of pop culture. Historians may flinch at the overblown nature of some of these missions, but the single-player campaign exceeded my expectations for a Call of Duty experience."
"Unfortunately the Call of Duty: WWII campaign is not up to the task, falling into rote cliches and overly familiar territory. While it returns to the era of classic Call of Duty, it neither captures the surprise of the early games nor the ambition of modern entries."
biggest_loser's comments