Good news that devs are *finally* utilising the PS3 hardware:)-voodoo_child-

good job underutilizing more powerful gpu xbox360.

xbox360's gpu is more powerful than cell+rsx working together.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

PS3 IS NOT MORE POWERFUL

JUST BECAUSE PS3'S CPU IS MORE POWERFUL DOESNT MAKE IT A MORE POWERFUL SYSTEM

THAT'S LIKE SAYING A intel conroe 3.2 ghz with a ati radeon 9800 pro is better /more powerful than a pentium 4 3.2 ghz with 512 mb and a 8800 gtx, sure the cpu is more powerful, but the gpu on the p4 is faster and makes the pc run games better.

consoles relie on more than just a powerful cpu, all around xbox360 is more powerful.

hyperboy152000

um you would get more FPS with the ati/intel combo....your an idiot with faceless "facts" gtfo...this is for "smart" people not insecure nublet chops who feel like their 2 cents is worth jack without backing them up....good job now leave

lol, ps3 is more powerful because of cpu

so by your logic all because of a more powerful cpu it's gonna run games better

that's like saying 3.2 ghz C2D with a 9800 pro owns a pentium 4 with a 8800 gtx.

the c2d cpu is more powerful but the p4 gpu is more powerful so games will run better.

console gamers are dumber than a box of rocks.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"][QUOTE="MGS9150"]

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]if the ps3 version seriously does look better this is a result of dev putting more polish on ps3 version than xbox360, because if the devs pushed each console to the limited xbox360 would look betterAIH_PSP

You sir are misinformed, the myth that the 360 is more powerful must die. And i'm not biased because I am buying a 360 next month, I dont even really care which system wins, i'm just spreading the truth.

IAM A PC GAMER I KNOW MORE ABOUT HARDWARE THAN ANYONE HERE I KNOW MORE ABOUT THE CONSOLES.

you people probley dont even know what the hell cell can actually do.

Ooooooooooooooh! I'm so scared!! 10MB of EDRAM. That's enought for me to store a couple pictures. Oooooooooooooooh! 10MB is nothing and the cell does do AA. If you are in fact a PC gamer, then you are dumb one and shouldn't be on this forum representing the other PC gamers.

cell cannot do real anti aliasing you freaking %^%%&$%#4

PS3 IS NOT MORE POWERFUL

JUST BECAUSE PS3'S CPU IS MORE POWERFUL DOESNT MAKE IT A MORE POWERFUL SYSTEM

THAT'S LIKE SAYING A intel conroe 3.2 ghz with a ati radeon 9800 pro is better /more powerful than a pentium 4 3.2 ghz and a 8800 gtx, sure the cpu is more powerful, but the gpu on the p4 is faster and makes the pc run games better.

consoles relie on more than just a powerful cpu, all around xbox360 is more powerful.

cell can assist rsx is pixel shading, cell can generate procedural textures, but it cant do regular tile texturing which cod4 uses.

maybe cell did some special pixel shading on textures and made them appear to have more depth something, but no way ps3 should beable to hold higher resolution textures.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]if the ps3 version seriously does look better this is a result of dev putting more polish on ps3 version than xbox360, because if the devs pushed each console to the limited xbox360 would look betterMGS9150

You sir are misinformed, the myth that the 360 is more powerful must die. And i'm not biased because I am buying a 360 next month, I dont even really care which system wins, i'm just spreading the truth.

no the cell does no anti aliasing man, this can only be done on gpu, cell could maybe pixel shade some blur to hide jaggies, but it cant do anti aliasing.

xbox360 is physically more powerful than ps3 sorry.

xbox360's gpu unified memory 10 mb edram overtake a slightly more powerful cpu.

IAM A PC GAMER I KNOW MORE ABOUT HARDWARE THAN ANYONE HERE I KNOW MORE ABOUT THE CONSOLES.

you people probley dont even know what the hell cell can actually do.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

i call bullchit on this

xbox360 10 mb edram + 512 mb unified

ps3 256 mb main 256 mb video no way ps3 version should have better textures unless bandwidth was a issue, but ps3's should be worse because the framebuffer would use half the bandwidth on ps3.

MGS9150

The 10mbs of ED RAM can only be used for AA something the CELL does for the PS3. Other than that the PS3s total RAM adds up to 512mbs which is the same was the 360s, not to mention the PS3s RAM runs at 3.2GHz compared to the 360s running at 700MHz, the 360 also has to use compression which leads to textures not looking as good.

cell cannot be used for anti aliasing.

the edram is for hdr aa and easing up bandwidth usage.

The CELL does AA, and ED RAM is used only for AA. BTW the PS3 now uses less RAM for its OS. In anycase the PS3 is not being held back by its RAM, it is more powerful than the 360 so this doesnt surprise me. It had to surpass the 360 graphically sooner or later.

no the cell does no anti aliasing man, this can only be done on gpu, cell could maybe pixel shade some blur to hide jaggies, but it cant do anti aliasing.

xbox360 is physically more powerful than ps3 sorry.

xbox360's gpu unified memory 10 mb edram overtake a slightly more powerful cpu.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

i call bullchit on this

xbox360 10 mb edram + 512 mb unified

ps3 256 mb main 256 mb video no way ps3 version should have better textures unless bandwidth was a issue, but ps3's should be worse because the framebuffer would use half the bandwidth on ps3.

MGS9150

The 10mbs of ED RAM can only be used for AA something the CELL does for the PS3. Other than that the PS3s total RAM adds up to 512mbs which is the same was the 360s, not to mention the PS3s RAM runs at 3.2GHz compared to the 360s running at 700MHz, the 360 also has to use compression which leads to textures not looking as good.

cell cannot be used for anti aliasing.

the edram is for hdr aa and easing up bandwidth usage.