Not that that was relavent, but Offline rendering places in more details at the expense of speed. Even the simplest scene takes 3 seconds or so to render a single frame, whereas the equivalent scene on the same graphics card rendered in real time will... be in real time, or 30 fps (sometimes 60 fps for shooters).
I know I shouldn't make calculations like this at all and i will hit myself later, but put it this way. 30 fps vs 0.3 fps. aka, about 100 times more powerful graphic card to render the same scene in in the same offline quality.
[QUOTE="THEKING1337"][QUOTE="Cook66"]1 is the lowest then? I'll go with that.THEKING1337
you must not have a sense of direction/humor?
Funny or not isn't relevant those annoying gifs have nothing to do in a signature, try making something personalized and remove the stupid Me>you thing and it may be a bit better.
the me>you has 0 to do with the gif,it was there before the gif.
It's part of your sig, and you asked us to evaluate the sig.
DVD is a bit limiting, but with some creative programming, they circumvented this problem by using different lighting models (which is what I was wondering they would do, after all, day and night are just different lights)
Wow, this guy just likes colour. He didn't say anything about gameplay, or if those games sucked or even if the colour made him never want to play the games. Unless you're colourblind, you like colour too. To me, colours (or lack thereof) help distill emotions. This is at the exchange of making the environments look reptitive until you move to the next setting, which gets on some people's nerves (mine occasionally).
Log in to comment