@m_kiehl @pbr460 @barrica No. I had an Arcade bought new in 2007, it lasted until late 2012 before getting the RROD. I was upset but not as bad as some people considering it lasted 5 years as opposed to 2 or 3.
@Plasmid_king @megadeth1117 Yeah lucky you. I have over 160 hours and mine actually ran better from the disc strangely enough. I love the game but it froze numerous times during my playthough. Guess that's what I get for being lucky with Fallout 3 I had zero issues with that game and many others had a lot.
@toddx77 Yeah that's pretty crappy. Thankfully I did just that though and made that save so I was able to play the Leviathan without starting a whole new game. But I'm a dummy and saved over the beginning of the DLC so if I want to play it over I will have to start a new game.
@axlroselm I haven't played Halo Wars but I agree about Reach. To hear so many people complain about Reach I was surprised. I got Halo 1 on day 1 of the Xbox release (I was 15) and was instantly hooked. And while I enjoyed 2 and 3 and even ODST I didn't put the hours into them like I did 1. Then Reach came along.
Sounds like for a realistic game he wants to have 1-3 shot deaths and old school Mario game play. You get to the last level, run out of lives and you have to start all the way back at the beginning...
@c0kemusheen That's not too bad considering people fork over $60 for a 5 hr COD campaign. I know they sink countless hrs into multiplayer but still $20 for 15 isn't bad. Fallout add-ons were $10 for like what another commenter said, about 3-6 hrs...
bingman5's comments