@pedal2metal214: I don´t know... There is a lot a fanboys around here...

@commander: And why do you think the review is "bias"... He review the game and gave the score he thought was right. I got to say that I don´t know if is a fair or not score. But ME3 has a great score and is a major crap so...

I´am 35, I agree that gameplay is important but the importance of gameplay is different from game to game. ME always had more power in the story than in the gameplay, and when does that is awesome, sadly ME3 is the exception.

I don´t like the Dark Souls serie, but I know is a great serie. No problem with that. But ME is not the same since ME2 dlc arrival. You may want to accept this or not, but it is an irrefutable fact.

@SunriseAngel: yup... Pretty much this...

@veldi: ME1 the best by far.... ME2 more awesome but not as much consistent... ME3 doesn't count, is hard to look at it as a ME game.

@commander: Agree... Pew, pew.... bang, bang... BANNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG... Oh... my youth...

But now that I think about it... I´m not that young anymore so maybe an intelligent game is now more important than a game focused on finger skills.

@Mogan: LOL...There are games better than Hitman... Obviously ME Andromeda is not one of them...

@Eddie619: Everyone can make mistakes... They gave ME3 more than 5... See... A mistake...

@Thanatos2k: "Certainly not as good as ME1."

Are you kidding? How can you compare ME1 to ME3? A work of art (ME1) who presents itself as a game, against a game (ME3) that presents itself as a work of art. So insulting to ME1...

@Wraith3: A post ME3 game as a sequel is almost impossible. Unless if you are talking about IT. But that´s just a fan theory... "The Artist" would never allowed such thing.

@ranbla: Exactly... :)