BlueEyedCasva's forum posts

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@jg4xchamp said:

That looks fairly dull. Other than the zero gravity stuff, the actual running around and shooting looks like a more lethargic version of modern multiplayer shooters. It doesn't help that some of the people playing must really suck, because that one dude was missing someone directly in front of them, but I was under the impression Squadron 42 was going to be some fancy/shiny version of what the old Rainbow Six games used to be. That multiplayer isn't exactly gonna make me feel that type of way.

Which has been any time the game shows its modules, its systems in a vacuum, but not on top of each other beyond "oh it's gonna be the amazingist, pls wait". The stuff in a space ship, looks rad for the most part, but the other stuff is when the game looks awkward if not entirely hoping that the visuals can carry it.

What was shown was footage from a live recording when all the players where playing in the same place and on the same voice chat so they weren't able do anything really tactical. Maybe they could have shown a more scripted footage on what potentially it can be while playing but knowing how AC was in the beginning there going be lots of improvements.

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@StrongBlackVine said:
@jereb31 said:
@StrongBlackVine said:

They continue to polish this turd. Should be ready by 2019. Gonna need another $50 million in pledges though.

Polishing a turd would be rehashing a game, selling it again and calling it "HD Edition" or "Remastered Edition".

This looks like normal alpha stuff to me.

Fair enough. They haven't actually released a finished product, but people have payed enormous amounts of money for what they are getting so far. I'm not sure you can call this development Hell either because this method of funding for an AAA game is unprecedented, but they seem to be long ways off from delivering what was promised. It seems too ambitious.

Yes long ways that there able to show off full scale procedural generated planets with sandstorms with planetary entries while working on a SP and MP with Ship battles, fps deathmatches, racing and etc which is all playable now. Get real they made tremendous progress and have shown a lot this year than any other year alone. There aiming more than tacked on MP for the sack of trying make your game more than a rental

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@quadknight said:

Looks a bit rough. I'm moderately excited to play it but after this year's disappointing Citizencon I'm going to be doing my best to stay level headed when it comes to all things Star Citizen. There's no point hyping myself up only to get disappointed by more delays. I'm looking forward to playing this when it goes Live next month however.

Considering how AC was when it first released I expect much more improvements in the upcoming months.

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@fantasygamer said:

looking good

Loading Video...

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

December 8

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@GoldenElementXL said:

Well this is a 1080p benchmark. That resolution is pretty easy at this point.

970 still going strong for 1080p gaming

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@CroidX said:
@blueeyedcasva said:

a 1050 ti gets 55 fps average on ultra

I would rather just get a 470 better performance and not a huge price difference

I wouldn't really buy lower end GTX series cards if I know I can get better one if I payed a little more not to say the 750 ti wasn't a bad card

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

a 1050 ti gets 55 fps average on ultra

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@abtoxin said:

@DragonfireXZ95: sandbox hack and slash combat. Black desert and a few others have shown how good gameplay can be

The combat in Black Desert was awful. Just hack and slash garbage. You definitely made me less excited if it's like that. :P

Loading Video...

Combat looks like something from dragon dogma and dark souls aleast from the very small combat footage I seen

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

I'm interested if it looks as good as the trailer. Honestly thought it was survival ark just looking at the thumbnail lol