The AI has always been terrible.Juggernaut140

it wasnt terrible. not the best but it was competent and sometimes really good. now its just downright laughably bad.

gears of war the SUPERIOR PC VERSION looks the bestcoldsteel321

he said console games and even gears pc isnt the best looking pc game. i shouldnt even have to mention what is.

That's disappointing to hear because I wanted to rent it. I had a similar experience with GRAW 2. I thought it was going to be awesome, but I get in and I don't care about the story, the friendly A.I. sucks, and the controls felt clunky. Sooshy

wow the way you described graw2 sounds like another way i could describe vegas 2. pretty much all those complaints are valid for this game. i dont even know whats going on in the story.

its like the last game with new settings, worse framerate, horribly worse enemy and friendly ai. the graphics are a little nicer and i must admit the sound is amazingly improved as far as gunshots go especially the way they change depending on range.

[QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="white_sox"]Didn't have those problems for friendly AI, but the enemy AI isn't all too smart. Anyways, who plays R6V for the SP?
white_sox

I play both. I like to go through sp first and then do multiplayer but it seems certain genres are going to be mp only in the future. Look at cod4's 5 hours campaign for evidense.

ok but even you admitted the enemy ai in rb6v: 2 sucked but why the downgrade? The AI was more than competent on normal in the first game and they were really smart on realistic. I guess they got complaints and toned it down. I shouldve known when i started the game and saw the new difficulty setting called casual. Casual must be like retarded, Normal is stupid as hell and realistic is probably like normal from last game

Um at the time, Gears of War surpassed any PC game's graphics. :? The only reason PCs outdo consoles is because they get constant upgrades.Cedmln

Every single time a new gen of consoles came out they were ahead of pc for a few months and then were left in the dust. Its the same every gen you should be used to it by now. Next gen with ps4 we'll see games that destroy crysis and then 6 months later you'll see something mindblowing on pc from either valve, id, or crytek, perhaps even monolith.

Didn't have those problems for friendly AI, but the enemy AI isn't all too smart. Anyways, who plays R6V for the SP?
white_sox

I play both. I like to go through sp first and then do multiplayer but it seems certain genres are going to be mp only in the future. Look at cod4's 5 hours campaign for evidense.

[QUOTE="Foxhound_spy"]STOP INVOLVING GAMERANKING or GAMETRAILER......You guys said the same thing many times before. MGS4 is AAAAA....TRUE MASTERPIECE and THE BEST STEALTH ACTION GAME EVER....Deal with it....ENOUGH ALREADY WITH THIS STUPID DAMAGE CONTROL.... Go play MGS4 with your friend PS3 and you know why it got what it deserved..........Knievs_101

9.3 is mediocre? Fanboy at the highest.

I was planning on making this a day one buy and waited because i had grown tired of the first and learned it was much alike. So i felt like renting it this weekend and wow. What a crap game, the first game I've played this gen and literally was like wow this game blows.

What did they do make the AI retarded after pretty good AI in the first game?? In the first one you have your team go into a room and they'd kill more guys than you, on numerous occasions they'd clear the room before i got a kill

In 2 my guys constantly, wont follow orders to move, shoot walls, face walls running into them, wont run to cover when i tell them to, they just move around in circles all confused. They are useless. Also the enemy ai blows hard. I fast roped through a ceiling window to find 2 guards just standing there facing me doing nothing. i took them out before they did a thing. The guards flat out are moronic and they only spot you when you are 2 feet in front of your face

Also the framerate drops to single digits basically any time a grenade goes off indoors.

How could the sequel to a great game be so technically inferior?

[QUOTE="blues3531"]

That review for mgs4 was probably the most well written and dead on reviews the site has posted in the last 3 years. It is reminiscent of greg k's great writing style. Seriously awesome review, great score as well.

Anyone else think the review was just great?

Stumpt25

TBH, if there was anything that lost the credibility of the score that GS gave, it was that Kevin rated it.

This is the same guy that rated AC = 9.0, NMH = 9.0, ME = 8.5 etc....

mass effects review was spot on even though it was one of hte best games ive played this gen, probably #3. but its not his score that sucks its the review system, there were just too many flaws and glitches to keep the game AAA, on the old system it wouldve been 8.8 or 8.9