I want to start this thread back up but discussing why Too Human is going to be on the short list of game of the year. It is a new unique game that intermingles RPG tatics and the brute force of an Action game. Come on now you cannot say this game looks pretty bad because the idea is good now we just have to wait until we get it off store shelves. And why can't you spell Human unless you tryin to sound funny and act like you are Jamaican
I think Too Human is going to be a great new franchise while GOW 2 will be nothin but a great addition to its predecessor and I think Fable 2 will be a much needed improvement from Fable
This does not stick out and is now way odd it is a new feature to create more strategy in the game and healers take part in war. You can be healed during co-op so why can't the enemy. Step your game up and it won't be a problem
No worries man Bioware is still gonna make the game it is just EA owns them now. Still do not know if it is going to be on PS3 though but its likely now that EA owns Bioware. But it won't really matter because it is gonna be on 360 and that is all I care about.
This conversation is pointless GTA IV is a great game so what if it got a 10 from Gamespot. And people are complaining how other good games like Halo 3 and COD 4 are better but did not get a 10. Well they both got a 9.5 so what is really the difference between a 10 and a 9.5 in my opinion I do not see a big difference. In my view I thought all those games deserved a 10 it is a matter of each person's opinion. Gamespot thought GTA IV deserved a 10 so why does it matter if you did not reviews neither validate or destroy a games value. Ultimately, it is up to the player I only see reviews as a helpful source to help someone make a quality purchase.
Log in to comment