I finished Arkham City on hard about a week ago and wanted to start new game plus with a different look. Someone on the batman boards told me that us Canadians do not get this deal. I'd really love to play hard new game plus in that beyond skin. I'm one of those guys who do not like to put their CC info on the net (especially after last year).

Help a fellow batmanner out?

[QUOTE="Majd_Abdulqadir"]I love my PC, and it's my main gaming platform, but I wouldn't go as far as dismissing other consoles, especially PS3. IMO it's worth to have it for the following reasons: 1. God of War 1 2 3 2. Uncharted 1 2 3 3. Mortal Kombat 4. Dark Souls, Demon's Soul 5.Metal Gear Solid franchise Save up for a new PC, but keep your PS3, these games alone make it a worthy machine.multiplat

not resistance 2? it was better than the third in just about every way. the only bad thing about resistance 2 was the wraith. it was every scrubs favorite weapon. and heavy rain is hardly a game. it's more like a boring movie

[QUOTE="bob__"]

[QUOTE="idunnodude"]

MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.

ristactionjakso

how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?

bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)

r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)

killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)

mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.

i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun

excuse me, then. i guess i'm just being overly defensive. on the other forums that i've been to, such as battlelog, gamefaqs, and gametrailers, people tend to name call when they disagree. i rarely come here because the traffic isn't as fast as the others.

MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.

idunnodude

how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?

bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)

r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)

killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)

mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.

i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun

the sniper is fine as is. you guys need better aim, or pick another class. if you want one-hit-kills, go play killzone 3 or modern warfare 3. there's no way in the wolrd someone should be able to dominate a game while camping 5 miles from the action and objectives. i hate having sniper teammates. it's just a handicap, because they're a waste of space. and to the guy bragging about his tv and kdr being 2.0 as a sniper, i'm not impressed. i'm sitting at a 3.0 as an engineer.

Why do you need to ask people what to buy, when you're capable of making that decision yourself.ipumpmygun

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]Boy, you console gamers sure do love graphics, maybe you should just buy a nice high end PC.15strong

You as a PC gamer jumped to conclusion becasue all you care about is graphics. He said bettter/funner stating things like climbing, zip lines, and jumping.

I bought a ps3 a while back and it turns out the 360 is still the better console to play most stuff on. Better controller. Better Multiplats. Netflix is more responsive. Dloads are faster. Most content is quicker to come up on 360.

Thing is I think the ps3 is the better console. I think it's capable of more if it was developed for. I don't think the hardware itself is designed to a multimedia device like the 360 is though.

I pretty much bought a ps3. All I use it for is The Show and Uncharted and a few other exlcusive games i'll try.

I'm not a 360 fanboy by any means. I don't even think the 360 is that great. I think it sucks in a lot of ways. I really was hoping the ps3 would be the more supported console this gen. BEcause I think it is capable of better games. But it's just not.

The ps3 does everything? Minus the exclusives the 360 does everything else better. And Blu-RAy.. But with Netflix who cares. I don't think I've used the blu-ray player on my ps3 once.

Celtic_34