[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]

[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.Teufelhuhn

LOL, BULLCRAP

on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.

ok better example, dreamcast 16 mb main ram, 8 mb video ram, ps2 4 mb video ram 32 mb main ram,

unreal tournament 1999 ran and looked better on ps2, why? because lack of main ram hurt dreamcast, they had to take out polygons and effects because it didnt have the main memory ps2 did, even with more video ram still had to be downgraded...so goes to show you main memory is more important than video memory basically.

That picture is stupid, and just plain wrong.  This is what happens when people who don't understand hardware use MS Paint.Teufelhuhn

the arrows are a mess, but it's correct, CELL CAN ONLY ACCESS 256 MB OF IT'S DEDICATED XDR,

show me link proof anything cell can also access rsx's gddr3 for main memory.

[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"][QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]

[QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.nextgengaming18

lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.

lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.

Well, kameo was a gamecube to xbox to xbox360 port, so you know didnt take advantage of 360 hardware, just so you know ps3 can only do 250 million polygons per second, xbox360 can do over 500 million +.

sorry bro, 360 later in future will be doing crap ps3 only dreamed of doing.

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"]There is no use arguing with you. My 4 year old computer if this is true will be 5x as powerful as a ps3 because it's cpu has 1 gb ram.. It is the clocked speed that makes the ps3 so powerful.nextgengaming18

LOL, BULLCRAP

on my x1900xtx 512 mb video ram , and 1gb of  cpu main ram Quake 4 on ultra quality studders, if i add another 1gb for 2gb of main ram, the games butter smooth, main ram is just as important as video memory.

[QUOTE="bobobobodfwofof"]

[QUOTE="DaysAirlines"]Which explains why all the PS3 games going forward look a lot nicer than 360 games. I think it's time to face the music fellas.DaysAirlines

lol, wait till you see future 360 games, wait untill they start using memory export and stuff on 360, ps3 wont even beable to keep pace.

lol hell no, the textures dont even come close to kameo or shaders.

YES. GET IT 2 YOUR BRAIN.  ITS NOT ENOUGH

THE COOLING STINKS. ( MAINLY THE GPU COOLING)

IN THE " PC WORLD " THERE IS NOT A SINGLE HIG END  / LOW END PASSIVE VIDEOCARD  THAT RUNS COOL

THEY  USE  MASSIVE  ALUMINIUM HEATSINKS PLUS TON OF HEAT PIPES  LIKE THESE  AND REQUIERE REALLY GOOD AIRFLOW










YOU ARE TELLING ME THIS PASSIVE POS IS ENOUTGH FOR THE MIGTHY  XENOS









machitocaliente

lol, yea that heatsink isnt really good, ati gpu's usually run hot as hell also...they should of had fans attached to actual gpu/cpu heatsinks.

f.e.a.r pwns noob games like resistance flop of man, games full of cheaters.

Sad, ps3 version more dev time and still inferior, lol.

Wasnt ps3 f.e.a.r announced first? :lol:

day1 the dev has same amount of experience on 360 as ps3 basically because it's their first game for both next gen consoles.

LOL, halo 2 looks almost as good as resistance :lol:

I think everyone knows by now, ps3 is inferior to xbox360 lol.