boofa_2001's forum posts
Thanks for noticing dude. Honestly, I was just bored at the end of the day at work and thought I'd see if I could start a fight. Looks like it worked :D I could really care less about the whole thing, though I did sign-up for both betas. I assume I didn't get in because I was honest and told them I only play 3-4 hours a week because I DO have a life other than games. Off to play some Resistance! Later suckers.Dude, it's so much based on pure chance, and don't even bother complaining. But after you expressed your aggravation you should have stopped right there, but no, you just had to say something about the other consoles and the "lack" of PS3 games, and for that you damn well deserve to get flamed. So if i may, *clears throat* "Just because you own all of the systems doesn't mean you're not a hater. But because of a little bad luck and overestimation of your chances you want to drag the PS3 into it and talk about the other systems, ohhhh hellzz no. So don't gimme this i'm disappointed and aren't there others who are recently dissapointed with sony??? NO. but i'll tell what i am dissapointed with, reading this whine-job, so cry me a ****ing river."
Thank you for reading this small flame, and as always nothing personal, posts like yours are very much needed, and they are the reason why we all go to the forums on GS, just not all will admit it.
Rakuho
You did not REGISTER for both. Only one(Warhawk) had registration.ocelotcougarWell if I didn't register, I wonder what you call the form that I filled out from the "Invitation to REGISTER" for the beta from G.A.P. was?
[QUOTE="boofa_2001"][QUOTE="dream431ca"]I have a better question, why the hell are you spending 400 dollars on a TV? Save up at least 1000 and that's at LEAST. Don't buy cheap, you'll be sorry you did.longhorn7WORD! If your budget is that tight, you don't need to be getting into the HDTV market and need to stick with a monitor as the other poster suggested. Even if you buy a small HDTV (32" or so), you'll need to spend $800-1000 minimum to get a good quality set.since when is 32'' considered small? Maybe I just grew up poor, but from what ive seen in mine and everyones I knows houses save for a few people, most of the televisions in their living room are 40'' and under down to about 30''...
That is true, however, we are talking HDTV here, 32" IS small for an HDTV, at least a true HDTV. In the past, 32"+ cost an arm and a leg. With the progression of technology, it has gotten much cheaper. Not to mention that much lower than retail prices can be had by buying online as online shops don't have the cost of maintaining a store front to deal with. I'm not saying you have to spend $1000 to get a good TV, just that you have to spend $1000 if you want a good quality, flat-panel HDTV. If you're a kid or a college student on a tight budget, get a nice 22" monitor and a TV tuner for your PC for ALOT less than $1000. Just don't confuse a $500 27" "HDTV" as being the same thing. I didn't grow up rich either, but I've always had a job and I was taught if you want something bad enough, SAVE FOR IT! If you're talking about today's instant gratification society, sure go out and buy a cheapo, low quality unit that you won't be happy with in 2 years. If you've got an ounce of self control, save up the extra and buy quality now that won't have to be replaced for years to come. That's all I'm saying.
Here's what I like and found a little more expensive, but oh well: http://www.sears.com/sr/javasr/product.do?cat=Televisions&pid=05771927000&vertical=ELEC&subcat=HDTVs&BV_UseBVCookie=Yes This is the one I like and found.General_Lee45You're actually recommending a Vizio to someone for gaming? I know a few people who have Vizio's, and while they're not bad as a second unit for a bedroom or something, they're not exactly primetime material from what I've seen. Sure, it'll do, but if you're going to spend $500-600, save a little more and get something better quality for $800-1000. Like this Samsung or Sony
Log in to comment