booniga's forum posts

  • 25 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

um...you have a time machine then? as well your logical is completely flawed your not actually restricted to short game times, and such there are many uses for kinect.

*non of which I care for* but please dont make statements without some sort of backup...and what if's dont count.

WilliamRLBaker
You are restricted to short play times. Name a Kinect game that encourages people to play longer than 2 hours? How about 5 hours? Furthermore, we know it's hard enough for developers to innovate games using stardard, Wii or Move controllers. It only gets harder to innovate with Kinect games.

With the other controllers you have a larger canvas to paint on. With Kinect, you have a much smaller canvas to paint on. As such, it's harder to make masterpieces with Kinect.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
As we all know, Kinect uses mainly your arms and legs for controller input. This leads to tiring muscles and imprecise controls. Even so Kinect games can be quite fun as the videos of smiling gamers playing Kinect can attest. The problem though, is that people do get tired of playing the same games. New versions with innovations are needed every year or so. It can get very, very difficult innovating Kinect games because all innovations must fall in the circle of short playtime and imprecise controls. All I can see is developers having a harder and harder time making sequals stand out from the original games. The only logical conclusion is that Kinect's novelty factor will wear out pretty fast. Judging by sales, the Wii declines dramatically after 4 years. With Kinect, the sales should start to decline after the first year.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I think we can appreciate the 3 motion controls in terms of shoes. Wii = Sandles: cheap, comfortable, versatile, but doesn't do anything really well. The Wii has low lag and plays all types of games, but can't do do HD, is less precise than Move, and can't do augmented reality. Move = training shoes: very versatile, does just about everything well. The Move can do just about everything; it can do HD and 3D, is very precise, has low lag, and can be used to play all types of games. Kinect = roller blades: expensive, can do what not other shoes can, providing a very different sensation when used. Kinect, lacking buttons and using arms and legs as controllers can only do a few types of games well. It is hard to see Kinect gamers being able to play games more than a few hours at time.

So, if we were to use the shoe analogies, all three types of motion control are here to stay. In the long term, though, I believe people will prefer training shoes over sandles and roller blades. Maybe, the Move will prove to be the best motion control in the long term as well.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
This baby is gonna look good on my 50" HD TV. PS3, I am coming for you.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="booniga"][QUOTE="markinthedark"]

quiet down now kinect haters... have a helping of reality.

http://www.lazygamer.net/is-the-lack-of-kinect-review-opportunities-a-red-flag/

"On the second major aspect, the fact that Microsoft are not sending out units to gaming sites for review and the review embargo is set for the release date, this isn't anything new in the industry and can mean one of three things.

Either that they have no faith in the product and are planning on selling it purely on the back of marketing

Or

They don't feel that gaming sites are the appropriate channel to market the device

Or

They want full control of the marketing machine and would rather manage it all themselves.

All three are true in some aspect but if Microsoft had no faith in their product then you wouldn't be seeing it in road shows, public events or any number of TV shows and schools that we have already seen it in.

I don't think that Microsoft do think that gaming sites are the best channel for marketing Kinect as can be seen from reading any comments section on any gaming site, gamers want to know how Kinect is going to make their games even better and the fact that it isn't doesn't sit well with them.

In closing, Kinect isn't the first title or device to have release day embargoes. This happens pretty often and while it is worrying it isn't necessarily a sign that the device will fail but rather a sign that Microsoft are dominating the marketing machine while they can."

markinthedark

If Kinect does what Microsoft claims and more, then the gaming sites would only help market Kinect. Perhaps Microsoft is afraid that the sites will say Kinect is a disappointment. The road shows and public events were planned in advance, before Kinect games went gold. Perhaps after the games were finished, reality set in and Microsoft got scared of what reviewers will say. I think there has never been a major hardware (with more than a dozen launch games) that had a release day embargo. Kinect might be the first one.

Let me ask you this, how many gamers on this board are sort of on the fence and waiting for reviews to decide to buy kinect? pretty much 0 of them.... the general consensus is either kinect is the devil, or they are waiting for more core games... reviews arent going to make any sales... if kinectimals scores a 10 across the board are you gonna buy it? There is no upside to it... only a possible downside... its a business, why take a chance if there is nothing to be gained?

hell we can watch a 10 minute clip of kinect working great only to have someone examine it with a fine tooth comb and pick out at exactly 1 minute in 34 seconds where there was a half second of lag, then make a gif of it and spam it all over the place. Gamers could care less about kinect praise... they will ignore it all and harp on the flaws. MS isnt going to be swaying anyone toward kinect with reviews, it only serves to provide ammo to haters that like to cherry pick every minor flaw.

the sales will come from getting exposure from casual avenues and from showcasing it directly to the public. Not from letting disgruntled core gamers pick it apart.

To say there is no upside to positive reviews is naive. There's plenty of upside. How many of the hardcore gamers have casual friends or relatives? If the reviews of Kinect are good, then the core gamers help market Kinect by word of mouth. Furthermore, core gamers may like casual games just as much as casual gamers. Again, if Kinect is as good as Microsoft claims, the reviews would say so. Microsoft is probably too afraid of the reviewers saying Kinect doesn't do as Microsoft claims. Wow, you really think reviewers are so stupid that they only focus on the negatives? Well, they are not that stupid. At the very least the reviews can give a clearer perspective on whether Kinect works as expected or not. Furthermore, they can give us a better idea of how well Kinect does when gamers use it for a period of weeks or months. Sales will come from marketing and from maintaining the novelty factor. In my opinion, it is the novelty factor that makes or break Kinect.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

Considering Kinect's lag, they should have sent review samples at least a month earlier ...

KiZZo1
hahaha. Breathe. hahaha
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

I think they are just building up the hype as much as they can, usually big stuff dont get reviewed this early

gamer-adam1
They don't get reviewed this early, but the gaming sites normally received the games this early so they can prepare for the written reviews.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

Basically

If x is good, early reviews will support this sales will increase.

If x is average, early reviews will support this sales will either stay the same or decrease

if x is bad, early reviews will support this and sales will go down.

What this means is that with a 67% chance MS does not think to highly of their own product.

alextherussian
I totally agree.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

quiet down now kinect haters... have a helping of reality.

http://www.lazygamer.net/is-the-lack-of-kinect-review-opportunities-a-red-flag/

"On the second major aspect, the fact that Microsoft are not sending out units to gaming sites for review and the review embargo is set for the release date, this isn't anything new in the industry and can mean one of three things.

Either that they have no faith in the product and are planning on selling it purely on the back of marketing

Or

They don't feel that gaming sites are the appropriate channel to market the device

Or

They want full control of the marketing machine and would rather manage it all themselves.

All three are true in some aspect but if Microsoft had no faith in their product then you wouldn't be seeing it in road shows, public events or any number of TV shows and schools that we have already seen it in.

I don't think that Microsoft do think that gaming sites are the best channel for marketing Kinect as can be seen from reading any comments section on any gaming site, gamers want to know how Kinect is going to make their games even better and the fact that it isn't doesn't sit well with them.

In closing, Kinect isn't the first title or device to have release day embargoes. This happens pretty often and while it is worrying it isn't necessarily a sign that the device will fail but rather a sign that Microsoft are dominating the marketing machine while they can."

markinthedark
If Kinect does what Microsoft claims and more, then the gaming sites would only help market Kinect. Perhaps Microsoft is afraid that the sites will say Kinect is a disappointment. The road shows and public events were planned in advance, before Kinect games went gold. Perhaps after the games were finished, reality set in and Microsoft got scared of what reviewers will say. I think there has never been a major hardware (with more than a dozen launch games) that had a release day embargo. Kinect might be the first one.
Avatar image for booniga
booniga

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 booniga
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

Its 10 days before release...why would one expect a plethoria of reviews for it 10 days before release?

and lol n4g sorry man that is not a reputable site...and any thing linked through it instantly becomes circumspect n4g is meant for fanboy news and fanboy news only which is why I never visit there. there are many places that put up review embargos including sony...it means nothing.

WilliamRLBaker
I don't expect a plethora of reviews, but I do expect gaming sites saying they have received Kinect hardware and games for review. It is less than 10 days now. Therefore, I think there's a good chance that most Kinect reviews will be bad. This best explains Microsoft's decision not to send out Kinect games for review.
  • 25 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3