I would love to see another Zelda game for the wii, and as a betting person my tip is for a late2009-early 2010release. Two years is a reasonable amount of time. Im also thinking that another Mario game will get a go on the wii as well, they've had galaxy, but with the different capabilities of the wii, i would hope that they can apply the different capabilites of the wiimote to a different Mario environment.
for example (i hope not this but this is a hypothetical): Mario Underwater. Its not a good title but ignore that, and think of the possibilities that the motion sensing could bring when Mario is underwater.
i would expect both another Mario and Zelda game, kind of to make up for the lack of titles in the Gamecube days
When i say "the next Halo" i mean as in the quality and stadard the game sets. The styles can be completely different still.
I was impressed by Killzone 1 however its still early days with Killzone 2 and i too expect it to be great however its early days and i just dont want to judge it yet, on the other hand Haze is just weeks away
Sony is onto a real winner with Haze, i believe that it could well be the next Halo (i not convinced by Killzone yet), but i also believe Haze has really slipped under everybodies guard because there hasnt been a huge amount of publicity for it. Although many people expect it to be brilliant Free Radical and Ubisoft have kept it pretty close to their chest.
I believe its been lost among the hype for Assassin's Creed and Uncharted Drakes Fortune (nothing to be sneezed at mind due, these will be brilliant too).
[QUOTE="lfckickass"]When I read the title for this thread i wasreally intrigued because I'm not actually that convinced about galaxy either. Butcasio techs reasoning is kind of weird and hard to understand. When saying mario should go back to its roots I would say that that isexactly what has been done. This is platforming in its purest form, and also themost 3-dimensional platform game to date, being able to change gravity and run on everysurface of an object. Also, havinglooked at your profile casio tech, I dont think I could ever come to an agreement with you about videogames ever.Claiming Pandora tomorrow and dead to rights are the two best games on the gamecube and then giving corruption a 1.0 kind of makes you lose some credibility...Glitch321
Lol, him giving those games those marks makes him lose all credibility not some.
Not all, he may have genuinely felt that the games were worth that score. However because of the fact that he cant put any logical reasons to his opinions, we all need to disregard the opinion.
he says the camera is bad... ok... it may be bad, but why?, thats how all reviews need to be done, you present your key point then elaborate.
Example (not my opinion im yet to play it):
Mario Galaxys camerawork was poor. It was poor because itdoesnt keep up with marios movements, you lose him behind walls etc etc,
But saying i dont like Mario Galaxy because the angles are bad, just doesnt cut it.
It obviously comes down to the player and his/her opinion, i personally think the game will be brilliant, but we cant make a judgement until we can sit down and play it in a decent length session for ourselves
[QUOTE="Sepewrath"]If you cant tell the difference between Galaxy and Sunshine you simply werent paying attention to the game you were playing. Also once again I havent read this entire thread but it doesnt seem like you have been giving any reasoning for your statements. You just simply say the game is bad, it makes you sound like a fanboy posting flamebait.Casiotech
are you kidding me? the polygon count of both games are virtually identical. Mario wasn't modeled much better in SMG than in the previous rendition.
And funnily enough you appear (i will only say appear, because chances are more will come out of the woodwork otherwise), you appear to be the only person who thinks this.
And this isnt fanboyism, this is a forum for those who have awii, and are defending a game from people who are bashing it before it even hits shelves
Id love to see a new Donkey Kong, similar to DK64, while on DK64 id like to see that on the VC, i still got it on the 64, but i think Nintendo would make a killing off it on the VC
In terms of graphics, yes it wouldnt look brilliant, however they have successfully done it in the past with the gameboy player on the Gamecube, and on the Nintendo 64, for the pokemon games, and also on the SNES with the gameboy player
As we are aware the Nintendo DS is unable to play games that were prior to the Gameboy Advance (ie the old colour games, and earlier), so my thought is why cant they produce some of the old gameboy games on the Nintendo Wii's Virtual Console?
Log in to comment