I've played about 30 minutes, without reading the manual. VERY fun, but I'm not good enough yet to judge. I find it most enjoyable when you set turning to be ONLY the nunchuck tilting, it's really immersive.
Because almost the whole library right now just sucks. I've had a wii for over a month now and Zelda/wii sports is the only game I play. I went to the store 3 different times looking for any Wii games and they all are childish crap.
Most of the games are quick buck turn arounds where the developers put no real emphasis on graphics or gameplay. Wii for the loss  I"m glad I have my 360 as my primary. YourExpert
So you haven't played... Elebits? Trauma Center? Red Steel? Sonic? Blur? Rayman? These are all really good and fun games I've played myself, and I'm 24.
[QUOTE="thirstychainsaw"][QUOTE="MaTT2011"][QUOTE="thirstychainsaw"]Have you seen Wii games? It looks like developers are only looking to make cheap games for the Wii to make a quick buck. wavebrid
And why do you think that is? Publishers KNOW that the gaming market, as a result of sonys popularity and assembly line production of insanes amount of sequels (the same game being sold over and over to the same exact market), you can make ALOT of money by making subpar products for popular platforms (like wii) as long as you have name brand recognition .... an IP to attach the shoddy port/spinoff too. But even THEN more and more games that are intended to be quick cash ins on popular franchises are surpassing their counterparts on other systems DESPITE being poor ports with added wii controls; because full motion activity is FAR MORE FUN than pushing a button. Take Tiger Woods 2007......from all the reviews, even though the scores are equal or lower than the counterparts, it seems that this game, as a golf game, is FAR more interactive and far more fun. Reviewers dock points BECAUSE they know its a techinically bad port (bad textures, ported engine, not much effort put into the BUILD of the game) yet they go on to describe the game as being much more fun than just pushing a button 3 times.....because it IS more fun. And because of this games, despite being poor ports, like TW07 sell alot of copies and turn an IMMENSE profit because of the lack of production (you dont have to spend millions of dollars trying to make it HD......especially when the controls make the game so more fun than the x360/ps3 versions). You have to look at the industry as a whole; its not nintendo's fault that publishers (and their contracted devs) are doing the bare minimum......the last gen set the bar so low for game quality such that it allows for bad ports to be made and then sell. Now that they are coming to the Wii with superior gameplay and control the bar is being CONTINUOUSLY RAISED because of the massive innovation presented by the Wiimote. Thinking things through is fun; you should try it sometime, son. If the Wiimote is so much "fun," why is the tilt (reviewer's like of the game) on the 360's version of Tiger Woods higher than that on the Wii? :|
Oh and don't call me son, foo.
someone else opioion
That, but more so, EA didn't implement the controls as well as they should have.
i see two mim games out of those games and two m rated games,
good day
Axel_rocks14
everyone of those games besides zelda TP is sub par garbage. and zelda TP is on gamecube so its not even an exclusive LOL LOL at mentioning RED STEEL of all things as well that game is trash try a real FPS like resistance for ps3 son. Ok if zelda is sub-par garbage then why is it getting game of the year more than any other game this year? You haven't played Red Steel have you?
Not even 1 PS3 games has sold 1 million yet, oh man, Sony concentrating on features way too much. lilrush
Maybe that's cuz the 360 was released a year earlier and you are comparing titles that came out a year after 360's release to titles that came out from launch to no more than 4 months from the launch of the PS3? Just a thought. Oh wait, TP's sold over 3 million 4 months after launch...
Log in to comment