Change your search filters to 1-5, and 6-10, and you will get a list of servers that only have that many open slots.
captalchol's forum posts
I did try Wake Island(hated it) and Sharqi Peninsula(loved it). I have yet to try Gulf of Oman(got disconnected from the game when i tried to play it) and i will avoid Karkand due to horrible experience with grenade spam.Dante2710Never played BF2 long enough to really remember karkand, but in the BF3 version I haven't seen anything resembling excessive grenade spam with maybe the exception of "B".
[QUOTE="Phoenix534"][QUOTE="obenns"]
Look at that big ass list. What ever happened to finished games being released?
obenns
It's a bad thing that they're tweaking the game after release?
Absolutely. You should be able to buy a game, knowing it is a 100%, full, complete product. They didn't do a significant enough of testing, the evidence is clear with this mile long list! Heavens, you don't go into a clothes shop and buy half a shirt! I don't remember anyone complaining about balance changes after release in games like SC2. Seems like some developers or genres don't get the same standards, but hey that's just me.I don't see another game really killing WoW outright. I just see people getting sick of the game to point where a they don't actually resubscribe after several months or so off. Personally I had times where I would be burnt out and take time off and then get that jones and come back and play another stint. I haven't had that urge though since right after Wrath of the Lich King launched, and definately don't see myself coming back for more. Eventually this will happen with most people, not because another game comes out and magically slays WoW.
Once you learn that people who complain on forums about said game with bugs or problems, are just the really vocal, whining, bi***ing minority(just read through the battlelog PC forums) then you will be fine. My only issue with the new patch is sometimes on pubs you will be on a team where there will be 3-8+ people not in a squad that don't realise it or don't care and the rest are full, empty or locked, usually just posting to your team chat helps the semi-intelligent ones get into a squad.
I doubt there would be any issues if the game specifies vista. XP on the other hand is a different story, and you may need to do some research on each particular game you plan to play.
Sony's biggest problem with being hacked was that PSN was down for quite some time. Steam suffered no downtime except for their forums?(dunno because I don't use them). I'm not too worried about either though, Sony didn't have any information on me you can't find through regular methods, steam may have some card numbers but it would just be horrible back luck to be targetted out of millions of similar information thats heavily encrypted and protected.
From what I understand though Sony was targetted because they were sueing hackers cracking the ps3 and games and such, as kind of a payback. I've heard no reason why they hit steam other than just to do it.
That's not true. All CoD games had a single player campaign, and a good one. I played CoD 1's story maybe 5 times.[QUOTE="yonyz"][QUOTE="captalchol"]
CoD and Battlefield originally didn't even have SP campaigns except for playing against bots so I don't think its fair to compare story based games on those two titles which are obviously geared toward multiplayer.
SickStench
That's what I was thinking, but then again it's been too long to remember accurately.
Reguarding CoD, the first one I ever bought was CoD2 and thinking back on it there was a singleplayer but it was nothing to write home about, don't think I even finished. My only experience with the original CoD was playing it a bit at LAN parties so you're probably right about that campaign. But I know for sure the original BF's only had bot play.
Log in to comment