have third parties released any addons for this and if so how does it work
carter15kd5's forum posts
6.5 seems like an alright score, I mean, just read the description of what that score means here at GS: "Games that earn 6-range ratings have certain good qualities but significant problems as well. These games may well be worth playing, but you should approach them with caution." Judging from the written review and the reviews on other sites, this seems to be about right. I, for one, found the gamespot review to be one of the most informative for the single player, and they really defended what they had problems with in it. That being said, the time gamespot spent with MP seems to have been lacking. I do appreciate the criticisms of level design that they gave out, but that is really it. They just didn't really talk about the MP enough which is sad since that was its biggest draw for me.Arc2012^^^ ur so right but i do think GS was lil harsh and ign and a few other site were to nice with the game this game is a 7/10 game
Who are you to say they're not giving their honest view of the game? It's their opinion. I gave it an 8.5, still a whole 2 points higher than GS's review, I honestly believe it doesn't deserve anything lower.[QUOTE="carter15kd5"]
reviews r lower then user review b/c fanboys give 10/10 and dont give a honest review
ozzsoad
That review really annoys me though because I know a lot of people will be going by that score and miss out on such a great game as well as contribute to lower sales and consequently fewer games like this being made. That saddens me.
4 some reason i get the feeling ur a fanboy1) this game is the best wii shooter (true but is that really saying much)
2)HVS promised alot and only delivered on 2 things best wii shooter and best controls
3) i understand u wanted this game to succed so more games will b developed but truth b told this game wouldnt survive on another console n pc
everything gamespot stated in there review is true
i think this game deservers a 7/10 nothing new to many gliches and failure to deliver on the major promises
reviews r lower then user review b/c fanboys give 10/10 and dont give a honest reviewStrange how Gamespot's review is 3.5 points lower than the average user score. I'll admit the single player mode is way too short and kind of leaves you hanging, more could have been done, but the online is spectacular. The online multiplayer more than makes up for the single player's shortcomings. I haven't had a single moment of lag, it's so much fun and addicting. Please, anyone thinking of getting this game, completely ignore Gamespot's review, they're insane.
ozzsoad
[QUOTE="carter15kd5"]to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii aaah ok. So you think HVS realized all the good reviews are liars and the lower ones are the right ones and that they will figure that ! brilliant! Well id love to have that lying detection machine HVS has ,is so subtle...Sigh. Ok i got your point, thank you.moving on..see ur acting like a fanboy while the person on top of ur last post has the right idea[QUOTE="intro94"] So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?intro94
[QUOTE="carter15kd5"]as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b done So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii[QUOTE="intro94"] if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much. intro94
its because console lack AA and AF when game are being dev
for people who dont know AA and AF are settings on the pc which making edges straighter removing the jaggies
[QUOTE="carter15kd5"]if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much. as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b donewell if HVS wants to be considered as a major game dev they should look at the reviews
also i think they look at reviews because i seem to recall them asking fans and people to send them e-mails of what they want to see in their games
Gladiator A.D. this game looks so bad ......it going 2 b so bad
intro94
well if HVS wants to be considered as a major game dev they should look at the reviews
also i think they look at reviews because i seem to recall them asking fans and people to send them e-mails of what they want to see in their games
Gladiator A.D. this game looks so bad ......it going 2 b so bad
Log in to comment