i heard from a tiger direct review that u can sli them just run the 250 as the main card

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="danger_ranger95"]

That's not to say...you can't have good looking games, but you're still going to have jaggies (it just can't produce the amount of polys to get away from that) no matter what people say.

danger_ranger95

Antialiasing is what gets rid of jaggies, not a higher polygon count, and the Wii is certainly theoretically capable of antialiasing.

I'm sure it is capable of anitaliasing, but why hasn't even the great Nintendo taken advantage of that then? I'm not trying to prove you wrong, or saying you're wrong...but I would assume there is more to do with it than just anitalaising.

If a system is capable of a million polys vs a system of only ten thousand, and both are capable of antialaising...which is going to have smoother looking edges? Again, I would assume processing power is mixed in there as well lol. I don't have the technical knowledge yet, so please.....feel free to prove me wrong :P

also the wii processor has nothing to do with AA its the gpu

i think that screen of twlight princess looks alot better then the conduit

Okay I like HVS but absolutely not. Nintendo can make great looking games take SMG, I personally though TP looked good, but not great. The team even said they could have done more, but they were pushed to get the game out for the launch. The only other studio I would trust, who was rumored to have done a little work on the new Zelda, is Retro.link027

[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="intro94"] cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man.intro94

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]

[QUOTE="intro94"]So its ok if their idea(survival co op) gets used and added internet(LFD) is fine, but is wrong if they follow suit and add swords and wiimotion plus?comon.07pops07

Well, I'd rather have something original from a developer - not something thats suppose to be like "x" game - though I can see many people want those type of titles - I'm just a person that doesn't.

now the grinder will not have players on the other side its just humans but this humans are not survivors they are hunters they all came looking for them the grinder is going to have rpg elements

one of the most obvious differences is one game you survive and the other you hunt

In some games in cod waw and killzone 2 i get massive lag but in some games i get nearly perfect connection why is this. I have a 4mb connection wireless

rahul_rul210

alrite u want truth about the conduit the graphic on the seeing eye and gun models looks good but the enviroment look bad

from the muiltiplayer videos the spawn locations seem bad spawning infront of a enemy

sound effects are bad

also dont think im just hating on HVS cause i am excited for the grinder

[QUOTE="carter15kd5"]

[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]

Riiight, so basically your saying it's all up to personal opinion.

So in my opinion, I like the game, and thus will hype it.

Problems?

umcommon

but than again im guessing your desparte for any fps title if you only own a wii

also if u haven read my earlier post i said moh was garbage

also im not goin to argue with you since fanboys have there mind already set and are blinded by the truth

while I agree visual wise there isn't improvement, gameplay wise the action looks alot more amazing. It seems smoother, faster, the story still looks insane while still managing to become a bit more serious. And the dual wielding still gets me =Pdonaldo1989