What kind of calculators were some replies talking about, cause calculators tend to have about 10 digits to them. Scientific calculators obviously have a bit more. An 80s supercomputer could handle a lot more than that amount of digits.
Another thing -in the 70s they could send people to the Moon, and go orbiting it. (unless you think that never happened - fair enough but that's a different story - if you go into conspiracies then you have to explain things like the D&M pyramid on Mars (curiously shaped just like the Pentagon & may have a Monkey King face resembling the Sphinx nearby - though you're "supposed" to think that can't possibly be true and it must just be some shadows that Viking photographed), nevermind that the Moon landing could have been hoaxed) - now, even though the computers and materials are superior, we can't for some reason afford or get people onto the Moon anymore. Think about it. True, maybe no-one wants to go there you could argue - but we know different, cause they're all racing to try to claim mining rights etc on the Moon.
The thing about technology maxing out at a certain size is true physically (for current materials used, it's not the case for something like an 'ultraconductor' for example), but there's no reason to be stuck making chips and circuit paths of a certain size - they don't have to be that small.
What the trend is consumer-wise is that, yes the tech is faster and has more storage, but it ends up costing you the same amount of money for a rig that is equivalent - eg, about 7 years ago I got a new PC, not top of the range but it could run most apps (it wouldn't have been able to run things like 3D Studio Max for example - not comfortably) - it cost about a grand. Today, for a grand, I can also buy a PC that is very capable and very powerful, but again - nothing like the best availible even in the home consumer range.
So in terms of 'what're we going to do with the extra power' of the desktops of the future - the same old same old - run 3d holo-games, VR stuff, store a modest record and video collection, download files and game online. A usual movie is already around 4GB on DVD quality, so even if you don't make or edit video or audio, you can't store that many films at full-resolution on a 500GB hard disk. I've got way more movies than that and I don't even seriously collect them, ditto for music. I'm counting in there that you of course need some GB for the operating system, the page file, the applications, other files, plus you need to have free space. So a decent media center, without backup!!, you do need about a terabyte of storage already - not including blu-ray or HD files.
Log in to comment