Ok as I agree with almost all of GS's reviews I will have to say goodbye to it. (I will still look at reveiws)

REASONS:

1. It is kinda hard to talk freely about things on here without starting a war.

2. If you say something that may cause a war it gets locked.

3. 360 is clearly the favorite console on this site and I of coarse own a PS3 and I can't take the bashing anymore.

4. FANBOYS

5. FANBOYS

6. ummmmm FANBOYS.

I was just wondering if anyone knew of a good site that I could talk PS3 peacefully without getting bashed for owning one cause I am tired of people telling me how dumb I am, when I know I picked the system of the future.

What pushed me over the edge is the fact that the Forum topic named (PS4) has still not been locked and it is clearly a bash on the PS3. Where as some of my topics have gotten closed without second thought and i thought they were harmless. go ahead look at the forum topic named (PS4) and just wonder how that got so many posts.

baller72

yeah, i agree with everything you just said, when i first joined gamespot which was around mid 2005 (xbox 360 wasnt launched yet), the forums were really peaceful the reviews were unbiased and not much hate in the forums. But then the xbox 360 came to life and all this fanboy, bashing, moderators... came in.

And by fully max out i mean full AA and AF in most of the games released so far.Here's the link to the card i am talking about.

"XFX sells an overclocked XXX model with a 580MHz core and 1.8GHz memory for $335".That's what i am getting.And since it's factory overclocked i dont need to take care of it's cooling and stuff.Right?

Gamespot had this to say in conclusion but i dont get the answer to my question from that.And they also didnt have benchmarks forany of the games in 1280x1024.

"The GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB performs in line with our expectations. It's a quick card, but it does have memory limitations. The card performs wonderfully at 1600x1200 with 4x antialiasing, but falls behind when memory size comes into play at the highest resolution and image quality settings. The stock GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB is a great option if you're willing to sacrifice AA and AF settings for higher frame rates. If you can't live without the higher-resolution and antialiasing settings, you might want to consider jumping up to the 640MB GTS or the 768MB GTX."

My other specs is a E4400 and 2 GB 667 Mhz Ram.

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6165714/index.html

Thinker_145

hey, this is so cool, i have the same specs as you, same CPU, RAM and GPU (exept that i have an ASUS instead of an XFX)

But I want to hear more about Crysis.:x

:P

gs_gear

i dont, its going to make me more impatient, I REALLY WANT TO PLAY THE DEMO!! why did they have to delay it :( anyway ill play world in conflict :)

8800GTS has a different architecture from DX9 cards, so you can do just fine without 512MB, that's why the extra ram you get on the 8800GTS 640MB is not worth an extra $100, look at the performance benchmarks, it doesn't even make a difference above 1920x1200.WhiteSnake5000

exactly, i have a geforce 8800 gts 320mb and played GRAW2 and bioshock which both required 512mb and i played everything on high settings without any major framerate drops below 40 FPS which is really good. And played world in conflict on high settings too. Go with the 320mb

old news...already a few topics about thisThe_PC_Gamer

who cares, its a demo, its the full game that matters. I dont care if the full game gets delayed till 2008 but the demo...