Â
Â
I love how people are saying that the 360 couldn't handle a game on par with Killzone 2. I'm sure if a developer had 4-5 years to create an exclusive title and a 360 only engine, it would look as good as Killzone 2. Gears of War and Gears of War 2 at their respective launch dates were called graphics king. It took almost a year to find a game with better graphics on the PS3.
Those games were made in half the time on a multiplatform engine.
Oh, but obviously we're not graphics whores because if we were, we would've built the monster PC to run Crysis on max instead of getting consoles so who cares about graphics? There are other factors that make a great game and we won't know if Killzone 2 has those until it releases. (You can't count on previews because almost every game has great previews) written by, some guy on first page.
Â
Â
ur right on some parts. if a dev really did have 5 years to create a game ONLY for 360 it should look just as amazing. gears 2 in my opinion is the best looking game for any console out to date (even better than mgs4. btw i have a ps3 and mgs4 and uncharted). so technically it would definitely be possible to create a really good looking game if they had even more time then they did. but we definitely have to hand it to ps3, they do put out some spectacular graphics for games, and if dev's use the power correctly, they can surely pack a punch. but lets face it, both systems have great games that output fantastic graphics.
Log in to comment