Mine is 3746-7028-2246-1001. Nickname: Lentini1993
christian1993's forum posts
[QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="low-down"][QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="low-down"]If they called it he would be able to shoot 2 shots instead of maybe make the 3. so if they called a foul he would shoot 2 shots because the fouls was before he was taking the shot. referees not gonna mess up the game like that.[QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="low-down"]im not a big fan of either team here but Lebron james was fouled by bowen those last seconds and the ref didnt call anything. bowen intensionally grabbed him and like they mentioned on tv Lebron was in the motion and picked up the ball to shoot the 3. so that was terrible that no call was made and a bad lose by the cav's playstation_wii
he was behind the 3 point line the whole time so it would of been three shots and they even showed the play in slow motion. everyone agreed Lebron had a legit argument.
No he was fouled then he knew he got fouled and shot the 3. but you don't know the rules of basketball so i'll tell youif a team is over it's fouls(like spurs) any foul will give the other team 2 shots if they are not shooting the ball(so even if your behind the 3 point line you will shoot 2 cause you were not shooting a shot)lebron was fould .5 sec before he even set up to shoot a shot. they would have gave him only 2 free throws for that since when he was fouled he was not shooting. NBA officials are not gonna call that because it would have given the game to the spurs. what Lebron needed to do was make the 3 point. to bad he's been to BZ his how life practicing Dunking to even make a 3 point
bro...he was behind the three line.....was fouled and as he was fouled, shot the 3...not after the foul was made as i stated in my first post. he was in MOTION ok so it would of been 3 shot not 2 and i know the damn rules so dont be a smart ass alright
Your listening to what the announcer said he was in the motion of moving away from bowen not shooting the shot. the announcer is dumb Lebron would only have shot 2. ginobli was behind the 3 and shot 2 because he was not in the act of shooting. thats would be real nice if they can foul lebron he can take 3 steps sideways and shoot a 3 and they give him 3 free throws. you do not know the rules sorry. Lebrons feet were not parralel and he was not ready to shoot when he got fouled. so he would shoot 2.What happened is lebron got fouled then 1 to .5 sec later he took the shot then he was complaining trying to make something out of nothing.
Peacebringer, YOU'RE WRONG so just stop arguing. Low-down was right the whole time. The game announcers even said that Lebron was in the act of shooting.He should have got 3 free throws because he started to pick up the ball to shoot when he was fouled so he was in the act of shooting.
Log in to comment