The kid may be arrested but he likely wont be charged with anything hes a minor nothing happened really, he was not trespassing as he likely had a ticket. They kicked him out that's about the extent of the law that will take place.
@Smosh150: Also Poe is now a military veteran on a path to leadership. Find me a single Vet that is on a fast track for promotion that routinely dismisses superiors orders
@P00DGE: SMOUCHE_MOLE's point is why is Gay even in the title of the article. His comic is not called Gay Green Lantern its Green Lantern or Earth-2 the series where he was announced as gay. When the article title includes the sexual preference and the show is being made by HBO, which almost because they are making it guarantees its not for kids. Should we/they change the name of Doom Patrol another DC property where many of the main characters are Gay to Gay Doom Patrol which is being made by HBO and is definitely not for kids. The actor was cast as Alan Scott the first Green Lantern who happens to be a gay man not the Gay Green Lantern. To me this type of title by the article writer is a form of bigotry. Why not "Jeremy Irvine cast as Green Lantern Alan Scott on HBO Max Show" then tell the readers about Alan Scott in the main article like was done.
I mean its not that big of a deal other than both games are huge file sizes. Weird part is for fallen order I just downloaded the PS5 version and it was all there already. Finished it a second time it was a lot of fun and looks terrific with the update.
@darshie76: I totally agree on not wasting your time on speculation read her actual posts not what others are saying she wrote and if you don't know the actual history of WW2 grab a book on it.
What she said was historically accurate but was a poor choice to use as an analogy. Basically your arguing she was spreading misinformation which I agree is bad. I have read her post in there entirety and there is no misinformation in them. Poor choices sure but nothing that is really wrong.
My point is there both wrong for sure but Disneys choice of words were not just a corporate line the corporate line is "no comment" those are Disneys actual words they used in the tweet before they deleted it and just like Gina is fired which is her consequence for her tweets there should be equal punishment's for Disney. Sadly this will likely never happen and it will embolden all large corporations to use there social media accounts in potentially harmful ways to citizens.
"At least these days there are laws that protect workers; when my grandfather used to work; you could be sent home or not even paid and you had no rights at all." This is still somewhat true in many states that practice what is called "At will employment."
Under California law, employment is "at will." This means that an employer can fire or lay off an employee at any time with no reason. It also means that an employee can quit a job at any time as well, without notice. Employment contracts and collective bargaining agreements that stipulate notice and conditions for termination are legally binding, however. Other special circumstances may provide grounds for legal or administrative action.
@darshie76: But they didn't say what you wrote above at all, which would have been fine they said:
Gina Carano is not currently employed by Lucasfilm and there are no plans for her to be in the future,”
Ok this is fine end it here. We will all infer that its because of her tweets and she did it to herself for continuing to make questionable social media posts.
and that her “social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities are abhorrent and unacceptable.”
I cannot find anywhere she denigrated anyone based on there culture or religious identities. She has made many posts I wouldn't and understand why Disney would want to distance themselves from her. However now Disney has assigned their companies perceived moral value to this individual and it will affect her life and they should not be allowed to do that. What right does Disney a company that's only goal is to make money in the entertainment industry have to make such a comment? Why do they refuse to comment about the stuff with them in China? What about the fact that they refuse to comment on the removal of the LGBTQ+ SWEP09 scenes for over seas markets? Pedro Pascals similar tweet comparing Nazis no comment, why? The facts are simple they fired her because they thought her social media posts may affect there money making ability. The point is Disney doesn't care about you, me, Gina or anyone except the shareholders they are there for the money and they shouldn't be allowed to use there influence to negatively affect an individual or assign any moral values to said individuals. No company should. I called it a slippery slope because of your point for now its wealthy actors/actresses what happens when its the regular person Disney decides to stoke flames about? What happens when its you or me? We wouldn't even have to work for them they could simply not agree with your social media in a bad way and your done no more employment anywhere this is the real issue.
Clubhouse's comments