[QUOTE="Roushrsh"]yeah the PS3 is all about the future but the 360 is just the present therfor in the future the PS3 is going to win :Pcabjnico

[QUOTE="0rin"][QUOTE="iammason"]It's doing a fine job so far.iammason

[QUOTE="dubvisions"]

[QUOTE="asmallchild"]It's cheaper for those who do not want all the optional components. For me, I wanted the ability to play hi-def movies and I needed a wireless connection. So $400 Xbox360 + $200 HD-DVD drive + $100 Wifi adapter = $700 or $600 PS3 + $100 HDMI cable (yes, I got ripped off...no need to keep reminding me ;)) = $700 well lookie there, they're equals!kingsfan_0333

you're kidding right? How are they equal then? 360 doesn;t have the option of the HDMI. Man, that is an aweful arguement. Better go back to school, smallchild.

How much would it cost for the ps3 to be able to stream music, photo's, and video's from my pc? Or how much to make the ps3 act as a dvr and record live television weeks in advance?

*Sigh* I thought price comparisons like this one (in which cows add a bunch of accessories on top of the Xbox 360's price to make it seem more expensive than the PS3) had died...I guess I was wrong.

Why is is so hard for them to understand that those extra accessories are just that...EXTRA. They are optional. No one has to buy them. Thus killing that argument.

The_Game21x

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]The PS3 and the Xbox360 are after the same target consumers, the Wii is targeting different consumers.dubvisions

i brought Wii into the aruguement because 360 fanboys use price as the arguement. And when they make that arguement, it is ALL about price. Not the quality, not the games, not the features, just price. So, my point is that if its all about price, than Wii should be the top console. But it isn;t, is it?

Its not difficult to make - it's a freaking fancy table for crying out loud.jackassultima