[QUOTE="HellRazer360"][QUOTE="eddy5791"][QUOTE="secondomen"]

[QUOTE="Darkzero6x2"]i really dont think it should have won Game of the year. I mean it was good but for a game of the year the game has to be replayable more than just once and add different things to the games play. it didnt do any of that. enemies acted the same, fought the same, and new areas werent unlocked when you beat a game on hard it also duidnt open up a different mode after you beat the game for the ump-teenth time. sure theres patches to add more but that comes months after the original game came out and not everyone has internet access to get that patch for it. It shouldnt have gotten game of the year and i truly believe in that. eddy5791

I dont agree. Thats like saying a movie doesnt deserve an emmy if we cant watch it all day long repeatedly.

Comparing movies to video games is ridiculous and is not even an argument. Like i said before COD4 should've won GoTY but it wasn''t even nominated!! I thought that was stupid.

So lemme get this staight, BioSUCK, which was good with ONLY 1 playthrough and nothing else, got GoTY, yet was beat in the FPS category by COD4..hmmmm.... COD4 would've definitely won if it was nominated.

Pretty graphics and new A.I's aren't supposed to boost a game that much. I don't even hear anyone talk about it anymore.

Then explain to me why COD4, the game that when always mentioned it had GoTY mentioned in the same sentence, wasn't even nominated for GoTY? Hell, here in GS, the preliminary votings have COD4 as the best 360 game. leading Bioshock by a few thousand votes.

[QUOTE="eddy5791"][QUOTE="secondomen"]

[QUOTE="Darkzero6x2"]i really dont think it should have won Game of the year. I mean it was good but for a game of the year the game has to be replayable more than just once and add different things to the games play. it didnt do any of that. enemies acted the same, fought the same, and new areas werent unlocked when you beat a game on hard it also duidnt open up a different mode after you beat the game for the ump-teenth time. sure theres patches to add more but that comes months after the original game came out and not everyone has internet access to get that patch for it. It shouldnt have gotten game of the year and i truly believe in that. HellRazer360

I dont agree. Thats like saying a movie doesnt deserve an emmy if we cant watch it all day long repeatedly.

Comparing movies to video games is ridiculous and is not even an argument. Like i said before COD4 should've won GoTY but it wasn''t even nominated!! I thought that was stupid.

So lemme get this staight, BioSUCK, which was good with ONLY 1 playthrough and nothing else, got GoTY, yet was beat in the FPS category by COD4..hmmmm.... COD4 would've definitely won if it was nominated.

Pretty graphics and new A.I's aren't supposed to boost a game that much. I don't even hear anyone talk about it anymore.

I may have listened wrong but wasnt the only player choice cattegory" the most addicting game fueled by dew "?

I think bioshock doesn't deserve it. I need MP in a game and it doesn't have it. SO NO!

But what i was mad at was the fact that COD4 wasnt even nominated!

COD4 would've taken that prize FOR SURE!

eddy5791

I was almost positive cod4 would be nominated shows what I know ...

I personally didnt think any of nominees were that great.

Agreed this question is very annoying if it had achivements they wouldve made a bigger deal out of it.

So no it is a direct port from the hard copy.

some people refer to the videogame community as geeks, and i find this unfair since its insulting and most of us arent geeks. do you think they have the right to call us geeks or why are we called that.simonromano2007

because it is one of the thousands of labels society has .

Seeing as i havent touched Halo 3 since getting COD4 I'll be skipping this one. I'll get them when they're freevitriolboy

same here havent played it for a month and a half.