@LordCrash88 @syler4815162342 Current gen could handle it just fine though it would look just as crap as witcher 2 does on the xbox at the moment. Nothing really changes this gen to next as far as a PC goes it's already next gen for those of us with high end gaming rigs talking gtx 690's or titans for example. This whole next gen crap really only applies to consoles dude. Devs already released that most of there testing at the moment is being done on the higher gtx 600 series and gtx titans though the game could easily be made for the ps3 or xbox 360 but why would they when its life cycle is over and the new consoles will already be out for awhile once this game gets released.
@MysteryGoat @Haeravon @cpenney96 aint paying 60 bucks a year to play my stuff online. better graphics. Done deal for me I can live with steam or origin or any other drm personally. Pretty sure two gtx titans and the rest of my parts are future proofed beyond these consoles with those too awesome ati cards equivalent of maybe a 7790 they are sporting.
And sadly it won't ever die off. Personally though i wish blizzard would make warcraft 4 instead of working on future mmo projects or 3 milked versions of the same starcraft game.
Should be "Why I think it failed as a reboot" Also think its funny this one broke all previous launch records and willing to wager still sold more overall than all previous games int he franchise. The Sales Bar was held far too high by SE imo for a franchise that had never been that successful . SE as a publisher has suffered through several years of poor finances and had been counting on Tomb Raider and a few other titles. Thing is beyond this one I would have never payed for a tomb raider game at all. Story could have been better , sure . But when has a tomb raider game ever been a chris nolan level experience ?
cpenney96's comments