cpo335's forum posts

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Honestly imo, Cloverfield was pretty good, but not super amazing like some people thought. I didnt like the dry humor, the iditic plotline of saving one girl who could just be dead, the ending was a little unsatifying, and the no-back story kinda hurt it, but added to the monster i suppose. Overall, I gave it a 4/5. I cant wait to watch it on DVD for the extra stuff.

And if anyone says its garbage, 3 weeks at the top of the box office is not garbage, especially with some good competition.

Premier1101

Was it suppose to have backstory though? The movie was suppose to be a testimony for survivors in New York during the attack.. And I don't understand how saving the girl was idiotic? The main character loved her, wouldn't you do that if some one you truly loved was hurt?

its not that it didnt have enough backstory, it didnt have any! I understand it wasnt the movie's direction to tell us how this happened, but more info couldve been revealed...

to answer your question, he didnt know if she was alive or not. He put himself and three others at risk by going after one. That is highlighted on how dum they were when SPOILER.

.

.

.

.

They all died in the end instead of the originals leaving then and letting the girl die. They KNEW they were going to cut it close. And she may be dead anyway. I would not take the chance with others to watch for, if i was bymyself, hells yeah. But I have a responsibility to get 3 others to safety, I would do that.

So what.. You seem to think its ok to let a loved one go when there is a chance they still may be alive? And the 3 came under their own power, they decided to go.. In the end I most likely would do in the exact same situation.

And no he didn't have the responsibility to get 3 others to safety they were grown adults.., They had teh choice of going but they decided to stick with him..

And it wasn't suppose to have back story. It was depicting a single event that surviors went through.. Its more for the sake of realism, that this is truly a real document record..

well, the people followed him into danger and risk of time, and if he was smart, he wouldntve risked them as well as himself. They decide to folllow him, he lets them, therefore he has a responsibility to be quick so the others can get to safety.

I know, but document is a little far-fetched and not necessarily real.... but 10 bucks said the government knew how it happened, but it was never said.

To be fair, they didn't know they were going to die. They were in the SPOILERS

helicopter and then they saw it get bombed. And when you see something get bombed, you think it's dead, but it lunged at them and took them all down (except that black girl).

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Premier1101"][QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Honestly imo, Cloverfield was pretty good, but not super amazing like some people thought. I didnt like the dry humor, the iditic plotline of saving one girl who could just be dead, the ending was a little unsatifying, and the no-back story kinda hurt it, but added to the monster i suppose. Overall, I gave it a 4/5. I cant wait to watch it on DVD for the extra stuff.

And if anyone says its garbage, 3 weeks at the top of the box office is not garbage, especially with some good competition.

sSubZerOo

The backstory a sin the viral marketing. You had to look it up.

I dont feel like doing research to understand a movie, the movie should explain itself enough... cant wait to watch it though!! should I watch it at 3, or wait till 8ish???? not sure..

Well it wasn't that type of movie. And a movie doesn't have to explain itself and every part of the storyline. I'm not going to give you the whole spiel about the plot and what you're supposed to know, but you get it.

And I don't like researching things either. That's what OT is for!

I would've preferred that when they met up with military, they couldve gotten some backdrop, but alas no. Yeah, i did a little research on it unfortuanetly..

Why would they contribute military aid to save one person, in a city that is about to be let go and hammered down by the airforce?

He's saying that when they met up with the Army, they would've asked some questions and the miitary would've filled them in a little bit.

But the point was supposed to be that it was completely unexpected and no one knew nothing about it.

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
If "Pro" is good and "Con" is bad, what is the opposite of "Progress?"
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Premier1101"]

Honestly imo, Cloverfield was pretty good, but not super amazing like some people thought. I didnt like the dry humor, the iditic plotline of saving one girl who could just be dead, the ending was a little unsatifying, and the no-back story kinda hurt it, but added to the monster i suppose. Overall, I gave it a 4/5. I cant wait to watch it on DVD for the extra stuff.

And if anyone says its garbage, 3 weeks at the top of the box office is not garbage, especially with some good competition.

Premier1101

The backstory a sin the viral marketing. You had to look it up.

I dont feel like doing research to understand a movie, the movie should explain itself enough... cant wait to watch it though!! should I watch it at 3, or wait till 8ish???? not sure..

Well it wasn't that type of movie. And a movie doesn't have to explain itself and every part of the storyline. I'm not going to give you the whole spiel about the plot and what you're supposed to know, but you get it.

And I don't like researching things either. That's what OT is for!

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts

Honestly imo, Cloverfield was pretty good, but not super amazing like some people thought. I didnt like the dry humor, the iditic plotline of saving one girl who could just be dead, the ending was a little unsatifying, and the no-back story kinda hurt it, but added to the monster i suppose. Overall, I gave it a 4/5. I cant wait to watch it on DVD for the extra stuff.

And if anyone says its garbage, 3 weeks at the top of the box office is not garbage, especially with some good competition.

Premier1101
The backstory a sin the viral marketing. You had to look it up.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
Splinter Cell Chaos Theory or Splinter Cell Double Agent
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
I was trying to decide between Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory and Splinter Cell: Double Agent. I like the stealth aspects of both games, but I like the kind of stealth with Sam in his suit, creeping around taking info, and that sort of stuff. I have played both before and I loved the Ohkotosk mission in Double Agent, but I fear that the trust part of the game will become to complicated and detract from the overall gameplay (since I never fully beat it). So I need your guys' help with deciding if I should get Chaos Theory or Double Agent (ansd yes I do know that a new Splinter Cell is coming out soon). Thanks.
Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Nwordjohn"][QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Nwordjohn"][QUOTE="cpo335"]

I can proudly say that I will not have sex with a man who is not circumsised because it is disgusting to look at.

Nwordjohn

I can proudly say I will not have sex with a woman with less than D cup boobs, a small waist and perfect thighs. Because I'm just that cool. Get over yourself.

lol Get over myself? Thanks for assuming I'm a woman you fool. I'm not gay so I would not have sex with ANY man reguardless if they're circumsized or not.

And I am cool 8)

Next time, think before you speak.

So you're not gay but you're also mad at me for assuming you're a woman? Looks like my assumption was right.

Are you calling me a woman?

So if you're not a woman, or gay why would you say you wouldn't have sex with someone who isn't circumsized? And what the hell are you?

I am a straight male. And since when can I not say I will not have sex with uncircumsized men (since I won't)?

Also, I can proudly say that you will criticize anyone who doesn't have opinions that meet your standards. Are yu uncircumsized?

Avatar image for cpo335
cpo335

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

25

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 cpo335
Member since 2002 • 5463 Posts
[QUOTE="cpo335"][QUOTE="Nwordjohn"][QUOTE="cpo335"]

I can proudly say that I will not have sex with a man who is not circumsised because it is disgusting to look at.

Nwordjohn

I can proudly say I will not have sex with a woman with less than D cup boobs, a small waist and perfect thighs. Because I'm just that cool. Get over yourself.

lol Get over myself? Thanks for assuming I'm a woman you fool. I'm not gay so I would not have sex with ANY man reguardless if they're circumsized or not.

And I am cool 8)

Next time, think before you speak.

So you're not gay but you're also mad at me for assuming you're a woman? Looks like my assumption was right.

Are you calling me a woman?