crapten's forum posts

  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts

Right you are :D But yes, i have heard bad things about the MP in the console versions, i think the reason is that there just isn't enough power in the current ( non Next-Gen(TM) ) systems to go go around. Maybe those games would have gotten better scores if they didn't add multyplayer, who knows... Icarus405

If only game developers could come to the same conclusions about it.  Current gen consoles don't need online MP, just local and LAN should be made.

Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts
[QUOTE="crapten"][QUOTE="Icarus405"] [QUOTE="crapten"]

[QUOTE="Icarus405"] [QUOTE="crapten"]The first CoD is the best, but CoD2 is close. I wish the IW guys would support CoD2 like they did with the CoD and UO but I still love all of them except the console version they both suck.Icarus405



Call of Duty Finest Hour - Just like CoD only a bit better graphics and different levels
Call of Duty 2 Big Red One - Better D-Day Levels, cooler weapons, a plane mission that the PC version didn't have, cooler and more tank missions, etc, etc

In other words, did you say they suck because GS said so or do you think the graphics are bad or what?

I'm not a fan of console FPS but I also felt that BR1 was historically inacurate and both games controls are lacking.



Every single WW-2 game is ALLWAYS historicaly innacurate. As for controls, you must mean that you are not used to aiming with the Analog Sticks, but after practice, you will aim just about as well as with a mouse. And in BRO, unlike CoD 2, you can cook your grenades and melee blows are realisticaly devastating...

I understand that all games are going to be a little pretend but come on, Germans running onto Omaha Beach off the bluffs? To me thats a little MoH if you ask me. I will admit that there are features in BRO that CoD2 needs and I have been playing console FPS long before PC and the controls are not hard for me. I probably should add that I mainly play CoD games for MP and if the SP is good all the better.



OH!!! Well :) say no more :D I play em only for SP...

Right on, From a SP side I can see why you like the console games but MP they suck.  I kind of thought that my mentioning that would probably resolve this small difference of opinions easily.

Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts
[QUOTE="crapten"]

[QUOTE="Icarus405"] [QUOTE="crapten"]The first CoD is the best, but CoD2 is close. I wish the IW guys would support CoD2 like they did with the CoD and UO but I still love all of them except the console version they both suck.Icarus405



Call of Duty Finest Hour - Just like CoD only a bit better graphics and different levels
Call of Duty 2 Big Red One - Better D-Day Levels, cooler weapons, a plane mission that the PC version didn't have, cooler and more tank missions, etc, etc

In other words, did you say they suck because GS said so or do you think the graphics are bad or what?

I'm not a fan of console FPS but I also felt that BR1 was historically inacurate and both games controls are lacking.



Every single WW-2 game is ALLWAYS historicaly innacurate. As for controls, you must mean that you are not used to aiming with the Analog Sticks, but after practice, you will aim just about as well as with a mouse. And in BRO, unlike CoD 2, you can cook your grenades and melee blows are realisticaly devastating...

I understand that all games are going to be a little pretend but come on, Germans running onto Omaha Beach off the bluffs? To me thats a little MoH if you ask me.  I will admit that there are features in BRO that CoD2 needs and I have been playing console FPS long before PC and the controls are not hard for me.  I probably should add that I mainly play CoD games for MP and if the SP is good all the better.

Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts

[QUOTE="crapten"]The first CoD is the best, but CoD2 is close. I wish the IW guys would support CoD2 like they did with the CoD and UO but I still love all of them except the console version they both suck.Icarus405


Call of Duty Finest Hour - Just like CoD only a bit better graphics and different levels
Call of Duty 2 Big Red One - Better D-Day Levels, cooler weapons, a plane mission that the PC version didn't have, cooler and more tank missions, etc, etc

In other words, did you say they suck because GS said so or do you think the graphics are bad or what?

I'm not a fan of console FPS but I also felt that BR1 was historically inacurate and both games controls are lacking.

Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts
The first CoD is the best, but CoD2 is close.  I wish the IW guys would support CoD2 like they did with the CoD and UO but I still love all of them except the console version they both suck.
Avatar image for crapten
crapten

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 crapten
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts
I would want to be a rifleman/sniper.
  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4