[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]

These are true ingame buffer grabs, cry moar!

Delsage

The guy on top, his skin looks like turd mashed together. The textures to the right of him look very flat, especially where the wall is supposed to be blown apart. Not to mention there are still jaggies on the charecter, and they show really well on the flame thrower.

As for the second picture. The characters weapon is nice, but the character itself still has jaggies, the skin still looks like turd mashed together. Where is says IGN on the right, there you can clearly see how Epic likes to hide it's flat textures by adding in a shiny touch up where it's not supposed to shine. Not to mention the doors right above the IGN sign, the ones that have a red and white streak on them, they clearly have 2D textures writtien in there.

Why did I say all this? To prove that it's not the "HOLY CRAP HXXR BST GRPHICS EVA!!!101101101". I still think give credit where credit is due, as to say it's a good looking game and their fire from the flame thrower is the best fire in a game yet. But it's still an Epic game, and we all know all Epic games look the same.

Yeah couldn't agree more... GeoW 2's graphics aren't that great but people act like it's the best they've EVER seen!

And again the thread isn't meant to bash GeoW 2, it's only to show that posting touched up pictures is just pathetic.

Because we all know games in motion look 10x better then a screenshot.

The pic is susposed to be larger.DuDisNow

Nope it's captured at it's native resolution which is 1280px × 720px

What a pathetically bitter and delusional thread.

mijkil

How is it better and delusional? I'm not bashing the game and I'm not bitter, only fanboys like yourself get bitter & become delusional.

Only reason behind this thread is to show that alot of folks here always post touched up pictures of the games they try to defend. If that's bitter and delusional then i guess you're too stupid to read what i posted above.

There are several bad looking pictures for any game, to be honest... but that still looks awesome. 8)

However, apart from the extremely detailed Character model it's not veru impressive. The floor for one doesn't look very nice, and the background has a low LoD. The fire is PS2 gen, and the collapsed buildings to the right aren't very nice either.

thrones

Yup and i agree 100% that every game has their bad shots, but i just dont like people posting shots that have been touched up just try and make their platform/game look better then everything else out there. Real gamers will know that all games never look like a picture that's posted in a forum, the only way to know how a game looks is to own the damn thing.

I've been looking at some of the "OMG GEOW2 IS TEH WIN!" thread around here, and it's clear to see they've all been made up of touched up pictures. Here's the picture that all the XBOTS keep posting up saying it was not touched, and as you can clearly see there's jaggies and it's not as smooth as the previous touched up pics everyone keeps posting.

Don't get me wrong, the game looks bad @ss!! But it's nowhere as smooth and clean as the pictures everyone around here keeps posting and braggin about. Still a top 3 game for this year! And the reason behind the post is to show everyone that touched up pictures = FAIL 24/7

The game just SUCKS and BLOWS, its sad to think that this game has been in the making for 10 years (of course not on the 360 but you get my saying) and this is all they came up with.

The ONLY people who are praising this game are the type of gamers that make themself like the game because they sooo want it to be a killer app. Just like my fellow PS3 owners who praised Lair when the game sucked @ss!!!:evil:

The game will be a big flop and everyone knows it, but for those that want to still think its a good game... hey more power to ya!:roll:

To me I'd rather have my characters look like REAL human beings rather then a bunch of ON Steroids de-formed looking guys. Also the Art style of Killzone 2 just kills Gears of War 2, not that Gears of War 2 has bad Art style but it's not up to Killzone 2's.

It all comes down to how you like your games to look, you've go Gears of War 2 where the graphics are all made up of shiny looking objects EVERYWHERE... Or you can play Killzone 2 that has a more "Real Life" type of graphics, just look at your clothes and things around you are they shiny as hell just like Gears of War 2? Killzone 2's graphics represents real life (not close to REAL but you get what i mean) the way its meant to look in a game. Clothes on the soldier below looks believable because if you saw someone with that kind of material in real life, chances are it would look close to the picture below.

Here's an example:

This picture looks like it's straight out of a CGI movie, notice how it's not like Gears of War 2 with its "Hey look at me i've got shiny **** all over me and around me!"... Killzone 2 is not perfect and it's got its flaws, but in the end Killzone honestly has better graphics.

100% in-game for Resistance 2:

Killzone 2 - Multiplayer: