Also too much difference is not a good thing thing Doom 2/64 vs Doom 3

[QUOTE="darius343"]Why don't people Bash BF for making the same game with shiner graphics or Pokemon which is the exact same game with more mons, CAUSE its a winning formulae.uninspiredcup

The diffrence between Battlefield: 1942 and Battlefield 2 was huge. Likewise Battlefield 3 (which sucks) was also very diffrent (in that it sucks).

People should be blaming consoles but the gaming media, publishers and developers  wont even bring it up since it's what brings in the sales.

Cod 3 and Cod 4 is also huge in difference.

I agree, now if only R* could improve relation with their pc fan base they would be golden.

I think the Wii U has potential. Think of Skyrim with directional combat swings in FPS mode similar to the original elder scrolls like Daggerfall. which translates to TPS animation in the big screen or vice versa. That would be awesome.

I think the next Zelda might be like that. Dual mode of gameplay, FP and TP

Though I am surprised Dark Souls is so well recieved. Thought it was boaring and the PC port was pure garbage!

1: Skyrim

2: Fallout New Vegas

3: Witcher 2/Mass Effect

Even as a Hermit I will say ps 3. Simply because I can't play that well with KB and M. And PS comes with a controller.

[QUOTE="darius343"]

Bethesda >Rockstar>>>>>Ubisoft

 

 

Bethesda made the open world genre. Rockstar made it famous. Both are at the the top of the open world genre. Ubisoft has aLOT of catching up to do.

 

 

The only developer who can match Rockstar is Bethesda. As was shown during 2008 when they faced off with GTA 4 and Fallout 3 both of which hogged most of the GOTY that year.

happyduds77

No it they don't Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3 and Skyrim are all far superior games and any of Rockstars games that came during similar time frame.

Morrowind > GTA 3

Oblivion >=< GTA SA (debatable depends on my mood)

Fallout 3 > GTA 4

You can do FAR more stuffing in a Bethesda game than Rockstar game. Not to mention Bethesda an engine that is specifically made with modding in mind.

Bethesda has made far better immersive open world experience with amazing lore. 

All in all both are at the pinnacle of open world experience though one is a lenier sand box action game the other is a  open world RPG dev.

This is off topic all in all Bethesda is IMO better than rockstar. 

Bethesda >Rockstar>>>>>Ubisoft

Bethesda made the open world genre. Rockstar made it famous. Both are at the the top of the open world genre. Ubisoft has aLOT of catching up to do.

The only developer who can match Rockstar is Bethesda. As was shown during 2008 when they faced off with GTA 4 and Fallout 3 both of which hogged most of the GOTY that year.