@NTenseify @dawg295 Im just one of those old farts that doesn't like change. Damn kids these days with their League of Legends and their e - sports...gnahh....
@NTenseify @dawg295 Not once did I imply that a sport was only "chasing a ball around" you fucking moron. Read my damn comment. I meant gaming should not be taken to this intense of a level! I played the NES when it was around, and there was no MLG back then! Just me and my brother pushing and shoving on the couch playing good 'ol games. I feel gaming should stay that way.
I could imagine a kid with some social disorders snapping over a LoL game or other game and going and doing some insane stuff, but I doubt this kid would actually do anything. Its definitely not funny at all to say messed up shit like that, but it also is messed up to arrest a kid for 8 DAMN YEARS when some people can actually get away with WAYYY worse crimes for less time! Or not go to prison at all!
@Kevin-V @dawg295 It's all in opinion. Some people will think this game is ok or good, like yourself, some will absolutely love it as much as the first, like me (being the Relic/COH fanboy that I am), and some will totally hate it. Of course its not going to totally top the original COH on any charts because COH was a completely new thing at the time. While I agree that a game that is too much like it's predecessor should get knocked down in the review, this contained enough new content to let me enjoy the experience about as much as I did when I played the original, maybe you didn't like it as much, but like I said, everybody will have their own opinion. BTW I think you are a great reviewer Kevin, you seem to always give a game a review that it deserves, but I was in a real bad mood when I wrote that comment and my inner diehard COH fanboy broke out.
Okay, this one is about as good as the original company of heroes, and that one was rated a 9. This one has a ton of new features, a totally new setting, the AI is good, and really tough still (normal difficulty is still a challenge in skirmish) so why the low rating?
dawg295's comments