I'm sorry your hung up with the gameplay aspect of the game. I'm talking strictly appearance!
desmith1231's forum posts
I'm sure not alot of people have Led yet, and I can understand because it is realitivly new technoligy. Just wanted people to know that it really does make quite a difference! Just trying to help!
I never thought it did either till I got this monitor. I tried it on some other good looking games like Crysis and COD-MW but the detail in this game was just astounding!
I haven't played the game in almost 2 yrs. I still have the same specs which are in my sig. Well, to my astonishment, after I picked up a new LG led-lcd monitor, the difference in the detail and the colors were mind blowing! I didn't know the LED could make that much of a difference! I know I only have a mid-range system but, Holy Sh**! To tell you the truth, I've never seen a game look better than this. And I've been playing all the fps games that have come out since. Was that engine THAT good?
It's been performing so well for me. At what point would you suggest that I upgrade to the quad cores? I am concerned mostly with gaming. With my new LG led-lcd 24" monitor, everything looks great! I am also running a 8800gt 512. Should this still last me for the rest of the gaming year?
Thanks
[QUOTE="desmith1231"]
2ms has been around in 22" for the last few years. led just make them really thin and offers very few benefits. they are exactly the same as a normal lcd except have a different backlight, the future is the ones that don't need backlightling. imprezawrx500
So, I take it you don't have one. How do you know how much better they look if you have no experience with them?
Because manufacturers pretty much make up response time figures without any testing, just as they do contrast ratios. Some review sites have done more thorough tests, and some 6ms or 8ms panels are faster than some 2ms panels. In practice, it doesn't really matter much in my experience.edit: whoops, read that totally wrong. :D ok, in this cause it's because the LCD panel itself is probably 80% of what goes into the overall image quality - the backlight mostly determines uniformity and the possibility of backlight bleeding. an LED LCD can still have pretty much the exact same actual panel as a non-LED, it's just changing the type of light that turns on behind it to one that's much more consistent.
I just set up the new monitor and I must say, the colors are so much more vibrant and sharper and the screen just comes to life! Love it!!![QUOTE="desmith1231"]2ms has been around in 22" for the last few years. led just make them really thin and offers very few benefits. they are exactly the same as a normal lcd except have a different backlight, the future is the ones that don't need backlightling.I'm thinking of getting the LG 22" LED monitor. It has a response time of 2ms [hard to beat]! I really no nothing about the LED's but from what I read they are the monitor of the future. Just wondering if anyone with one could expound on it.
imprezawrx500
So, I take it you don't have one. How do you know how much better they look if you have no experience with them?
Log in to comment