[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

[QUOTE="PS_Family"]Lord Tretton pimp slapped the competition this year.ReverseCycology

How? By spewing out boldface lies , sugar coating PSN's mediocre game library and acting like PS3 movie downloads were somwthing new and fresh?

Lemme add to that list. Introducing another sku with no BC, showing mostly shooter games, stating a release date to an unfinished Home beta, showing that they still support the PS2 but taking out BC, saying that XXX amount of games will come out by the end of the year which most of these games are inferior multiplats, showing more just wait games that who knows if and when they'll come out for reals, and lying about how they have the most exclusives while they just lost one of the biggest exclusive in life FFXIII. "2008 is the year of the PS3."

OH.MY.GOD..... I can believe you guys. You wait 3 day and you start claim victory after Sony messed up!!! I agree with this guy, all they did is show teasers and trailers like they did for 2 years and game play for only one game R2 which it is a good game but the gameplay was not that good. All they did is say they were supporting the ps2 more and the psp and the next games are coming 2 years at most.

All they said is give us more time after 2 years. Not one of you talked about the speech about how long it took to gat good games on their older systems.

Penny arcade said it best....

All and all, this E3 SUCKED.

No one bought a nintendo system for rpgs allown. All nintendo systems were bought for nintendo 1st party games.

Sony doesn't have a strong 1st party selection.

S-E CAHANGE TO FROM NINTENDO TO SONY IS NOT LIKE THE CHANGE FRON SONY TO MS. NINTENDO NEVER NEEDED THEM AND SONY HAD NOTHING ELSE.

So quite frankly...you'd have rather seen gameplay videos of games you already knew were coming out, instead of new IP's and sequels, right?

If so, uhh...good for you?

ice144

No, that not what I said. I do want new games with some gameplay shown.

hello

Well I only own a PS3 only and there's more then enough first and third party titles for me. When you say Sony doens't have enough first party stuff you sure your not confusing that with M$? Last I checked PS3 had tons more exclusive first party games.-Renegade

Like?

[QUOTE="desperado9999"]

About Sony....

psn_Jaimzl

im sorry but even long posts can be dumb and this proves it ^^

Could you explain why? I feel I have good points.

I got to the part about Uncharted and didn't even bother finishing the post.

Uncharted is an absolutely amazing game and the vast majority of people who have played it will agree with me.

gamefreakomega

I said it was a good game. Please finish reading it. All I said was RE4 was better and that if it was more like that with the extra it would be better.

About Sony....

Hey,man , listen...... I know sony announced more titles....4 new titles....but none of the ANNOUNCEMENTS showed gameplay, it was mostly concepts and teasers. The samething that happened this e3 happened Last year, ms had the better line up and everyone was sure sony would have a better line up 2008 and look what happen , ms has a better line up again. Ms has a history of keeping the focus on the current year games.....and realising info on their X'0 events.X'08 IS NEXT FOR THEM.

Yes,God of war was announce this e3 but......it was already announce before, many months before and they just show a 20 sec teaser as a reminder. Now the last time they did something this was in '05 and '06....and we all know what happened next. This e3 is like '06 all over again. They should have shown gameplay, MAG AND GOW were just pitches with no gaqmeplay to back it up. Say what you want about ms and nintendo but they at lease have gameplay and ms is getting all the rpgs. I'm surprised that your so quick to defend Sony with 2 years of next to 0 support for games for the ps3 and with them just showing short trailers. Yes, they have more 1st party games, but are they better games that are on the market, NO.

Let me give you an example, Uncharted. It is a good game, but it was short and a single player game, which is inexcusable. Now compare it to RE4 AN '05 GAME. It was long,had extra modes after end game and many sub games to boot. Uncharted should not be compared to GEoW , it's just a better version of Stanglehold.

MGS and Little Big Planet is the only thing to have a ps3 for other than the theirs no point, not for rpgs, not for shooters, or adventure games or any thing. And please don't bring up blue ray, it's not worth the cost of it and it clear that Sony is getting ready secure the possibility to abandoning it.(No, I did not say the will just that they could.) I just that it's 2 and a half years, all they have is MGS and after Lbp their is nothing. It's the new Xbox. And now their asking to wait again.

Now their plenty of things they could do to improve the service like add more content for Uncharted, new levels for heavly sword, and etc. Other than Rachet and clank there's nothing added on.

Also, look at the history of the sony brand. 3rd party game have all ways been they strongest sellers, never first party. In fact that later stung the with the psp. It had next to 0 1st party support and never started selling after their launch until 3rd party start to make games for it few years later. 1st party sony was never very strong and the ps3 has no 3rd party. Man, it has no rpgs.

Now with ff13, ff13 dosn't really matter. It's true that 1 game will not change game market sales, look at Halo. But it not ff13 , which is now multiplt, that make the 360 better the ps3, it's the fact that 4 jrpg and 4 wrpgs in additional are coming on the 360.If your an rpg lover it impossible to ignore the 360 now that the fear of not playing ff13 is away.(Only for people out side of japan).

You really should ask yourself why am I only support the ps3 with so little game? Why I passionately hate other systems now? Right now their no reson to just support it. Now if you still want to keep your ps3, go on, but just remember.....it will be the past 2 years all over again.

I know the ps3 is not a horrible system but in reality it just a system with the same graphics of other systems with little extras.

It just that their better things out their, pc,360 and Wii.

Hey,man , listen...... I know sony anounced more titles....4 new titles....but none of the ANNOUNCEMENTS showed gameplay, it was mostly consepts and teasers. The samething that happened this e3 happened Last year, ms had the better line up and everyone was sure sony would have a better line up 2008 and look what happen , ms has a better line up again. Ms has a history of keeping the focus on the curret year games.....and realsing info on their X'0 events.X'08 IS NEXT FOR THEM.

Yes,God of war was announes this e3 but......it was already announce before, many months before and they just show a 20 sec teaser as a reminder. Now the last time they did something this was in '05 and '06....and we all know what happened next. This e3 is like '06 all over agein. They should have shown gameplay, MAG AND GOW were just pitches with no gaqmeplay to back it up. Say what you want about ms and nintendo but they at lease have gameplay and ms is getting all the rpgs. I'm surprised that your so quick to defend Sony with 2 years of next to 0 support for games for the ps3 and with them just showing short trailers. Yes, they have more 1st party games, but are they better games that are on the market, NO.

Let me give you an exaple, Uncharted. It is a good game, but it was short and a single player game, which is unexscusible. Now compare it to RE4 AN '05 GAME. It was long,had extra modes after end game and many sub games to boot. Uncharted should not be compard to GEoW , it's just a better version of Stanglehold.

MGS and Little Big Planet is the only thing to have a ps3 for other than the theirs no point, not for rpgs, not for shooters, or adventure games or any thing. And please don't bring up blue ray, it's not worth the cost of it and it clear that Sony is getting ready secure the posibility to abandoning it.(No, I did not say the will just that they could.) I just that it's 2 and a half years, all they have is MGS and after Lbp their is nothing. It's the new Xbox. And now their asking to wait again.

Now their plenty of things they could do to improve the service like add more content for Uncharted, new levels for heavly sword, and etc. Other than Rachet and clank there's nothing added on.

Also, look at the history of the sony brand. 3rd party game have all ways been they strongest sellers, never first party. In fact that later stung the with the psp. It had next to 0 1st party support and never started selling after theit launch until 3rd party start to make games for it few years later. 1st party sony was never very strong and the ps3 has no 3rd party. Man, it has no rpgs.

Now with ff13, ff13 dosn't really matter. It's true that 1 game will not change game market sales, look at Halo. But it not ff13 , which is now multiplt, that make the 360 better the ps3, it's the fact that 4 jrpg and 4 wrpgs in additional are coming on the 360.If your an rpg lover it impossible to ignore the 360 now that the fear of not playing ff13 is away.(Only for people out side of japan).

You really should ask yourself why am I only support the ps3 with so little game? Why I passionately hate other systems now? Right now their no reson to just support it. Now if you still want to keep your ps3, go on, but just remember.....it will be the past 2 years all over again.

I know the ps3 is not a horrible system but in reality it just a system with the same graphics of other systems with little extras.

It just that their better things out their, pc,360 and Wii.