deu5ka175's forum posts

Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

Tenaka man you do not impress anyone. If you were not such a d!ck on here, most of us would feel sorry for you. I think it is nice you have a good computer (I guess), but the fact you have to continuously throw it in everyone's fact shows that you are probably the only peasant around here. You claim you know me. And I am pretty sure I have at least as much if not more than everyone else on this board.
Like I said....you are not only a pretty pathetic troll. You seem to be a pathetic person in general. I am going back to the board to talk about games now. Don't bother with a response. I am not interested.

Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="deu5ka175"]The first one did not have the competition when it was released. It was also a tech marvel. The second one was just a solid game thrown into the mix when a ton of other solid shooters. Plus the whole Call of Duty thing started.....N30F3N1X

Did not have the competition? What the f*ck? It released together with CoD4, Halo 3 and Unreal Tournament 3 :|

I was talking about on a technical level. Even I was amazed at the way it looked when it first came out. But under the tech it was just a good shooter.
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="deu5ka175"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

No, it sold less because they pissed off there fanbase and tried to pander to console peasants by dumbing down the game to much.

tenaka2

Funny. I have played both. The second one is a better game in every way. The only thing the first one did better was it was more open. And I do not recall anyone forcing a bottom feeder to play it. Since every major title comes to consoles these days I guess Hermits no longer have games to play.

If you had played the first game you would not say that, so you are a liar.

So please go back to your trailer and go crying to the mods again.

I guess you did not notice my sig....... Just admit it. If a game is on console you have a problem with it. You are so obsessed with thinking you are special and above everyone (Which usually means you are at the bottom of the pile) that you hate anything that others enjoy. And that makes you come off as quite pathetic.
The whole (You never played it) is like a 9 year olds comeback. I expect better from someone with a God Complex.

Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts
[QUOTE="deu5ka175"]

Meh. Series has grown stale.

BloodDamage
Why? Just because of All 4 One. That one sucked but its just one game and they wanted to try something different. They are going to go back to making a regular R&C game after this one if you dont like it because of the changes they are making. If you didnt like Crack in Time for whatever reason well then I dont know what to tell you lol. I thought that game was amazing. Ive been playing this beta for a couple days and I went in skeptical but it is pretty dang fun. Have an open mind.

No....I have not been able to finish one without growing bored. I did like Future Tools of Destruction. But I do not like Insomniac's humor. I also hate Clank. Insomniac is too good of a developer to keep pushing out R&C games. I actually though Resistance 3 was a nice surprise (single player). I would of rather got another one of those then an 8th (?) R&C game.
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="deu5ka175"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

Still sold less then the original, which was on one platform, not 3.

tenaka2

The first one did not have the competition when it was released. It was also a tech marvel. The second one was just a solid game thrown into the mix when a ton of other solid shooters. Plus the whole Call of Duty thing started.....

No, it sold less because they pissed off there fanbase and tried to pander to console peasants by dumbing down the game to much.

Funny. I have played both. The second one is a better game in every way. The only thing the first one did better was it was more open. And I do not recall anyone forcing a bottom feeder to play it. Since every major title comes to consoles these days I guess Hermits no longer have games to play.
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

I'm no cow,just enjoy my playstation,but I love how sony keep putting out their own games.The last of us,Beyond:two souls,Sly cooper,Pupeteer,GOW ascension,all still to come and this late in the gen.Lots of variety their,only the most rabid fanboys can deny sony give their customers great games.

OneInchMan99
Yeah.....You act like Microsoft doesn't. It is common knowledge )Except for the Cows here.....they just don't get it.) that Microsoft have moved most of their first party to the 720. I don't know about you but I would rather the new systems launch with plenty of games. Lionhead and Turn 10 both supposed to have a game at launch. Sony has not even mentioned the PS4. This gen is over and Microsoft moved on. But they are throwing us a bone by giving us i more game from out top 4 exclusives with another Halo, Gears, Forza, and Fable. So thinking like that it seems Microsoft is actually doing the gamers right unlike the original XBOX that they dropped cold. Microsoft has did everything right this gen. We got a buttload of exclusives the first part of the gen and then they gave us the good stuff at the end. They have also made XBLA a big priority and it is nice paying $10 to $20 on retail level quality games. But Cows can't grasp that. They love their average (Twisted Metal) and below average (Starhawk and All-stars) $60 retail games.
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Another one of these. Go to page 1 and let the damage control commence.

Quick Question: Why do people think PS3 exclusives don't sell...

Truth is that PS3 exclusives sell very well, in fact they out sell most 360 exclusives. It's actually the lems who don't buy their exclusives, which is why MS stopped making them. Outside of Halo and Gears that is, the only 360 exclusives people buy.

razgriz_101

Strangely games like Forza manage to clock in at about 4mil over their lifespans, and strangely heres the tricky part its neither gears nor halo.

Also games like trials evolution havve done well on XBLA aswell.

Just thought i'd stop you throwing more misinformation around.

Fable. Kameo, PDZ, the PGR games, and the first Crackdown have also done well. Why even argue with him? He is obviously the most biased Cow on the site except for maybe Babykeeh and ispeakfact.
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

Meh. Series has grown stale.

Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

Crytek should stfu

They are in no position to make predictions, when was the last time they made anything that sold well?

tenaka2

Crysis 2. At least 3 million sold.

Still sold less then the original, which was on one platform, not 3.

The first one did not have the competition when it was released. It was also a tech marvel. The second one was just a solid game thrown into the mix when a ton of other solid shooters. Plus the whole Call of Duty thing started.....
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

You know what they say, The best games get the most hate.

I think it goes:
Halo Reach- I thought this one was practically perfect.
Halo 3- Almost perfect but the first maps did not impress me in multiplayer
Halo 2- Good multiplayer- Slightly disappointed in the single player. XBOX struggled with some of the graphics
Halo ODST- Better then I thought it would be
Halo Wars- I don't like RTS games
Halo CE- Too much backtracking