dfgeryrfgdsfter's forum posts

Avatar image for dfgeryrfgdsfter
dfgeryrfgdsfter

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dfgeryrfgdsfter
Member since 2009 • 42 Posts

GameSpot's 7.0 review is way more reflective about how I feel about the game. 8.7 is too high. F.E.A.R. 2 isn't a bad game, it's just lacking that something that made the first one great. The graphics aren't as groundbreaking for their time, either. Monolith did an incredible job at detailing their world, using a ton of little props and effects to make the atmosphere in some environments such as the school believable, but on a technical level the game is about average. I will say that the level design is superior to the first F.E.A.R.'s, though.Einhanderkiller

You must not know level design very well, the new one has much better level design.

the single player is much scarier in the second one, lol well none scary but well trys to do scares better.

the first games level design seem very ametur in comparison to 2#.

my only problem they should of took time to add a solid multiplayer, 6 maps? wtf

Avatar image for dfgeryrfgdsfter
dfgeryrfgdsfter

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dfgeryrfgdsfter
Member since 2009 • 42 Posts

See this screenshot? it clearly shows the mod is ps3 biased, banned me for saying ps3 version of fear2 has watered down textures from pc...the xbox360 version does also, but he only erased ps3 comment.

http://i40.tinypic.com/afen4i.jpg

what a fanboy lol.

fear2 on pc owns xbox360/ps3 textures and killzone2 on ps3 textures.

game over, like my acount in acouple seconds lol.