diped's forum posts
Also who in their right mind would use wifi to game? Maybe ps3 owners. hahaha.
Yup, the HL, Mario, FF, Zelda & RE series should just stop all the milking as well. sad[QUOTE="SecretPolice"][QUOTE="0rin"]WOOOW!!! MORE HALO!!!!
If you couldn't tell, I'm less than impressed. At this point, its absolute milkage. they ended the "story", and are now just milking the name. sad.
Leejjohno
The difference is that Halo 3 was the last in a trilogy, said to have finished the fight... If anything it just shows that bungie is talentless. They absolutely cannot seem to make anything else but Halo.
Mark my words, they will keep making Halo games until they go out of business, which will be never.
Why would you ever want to stop making a game that would make your business ridiculous amounts of money? It just makes no sense. Not to mention all that money allows you to fund bigger games, and allows your company to take more risks and create different games.It just makes sense, how you dont see that, I really don't know.
I don't see the point, but I'm sure a ton of people will still buy into it.
If your getting your first DS the dsi would be a good choice, even though its more expensive, you get 1000 free points with it which I assume will buy a game and a quarter. Not to mention the slightly larger screen size.
I hope they improve the hinge, because if you have a touchscreen up top too, and your pressing hard on it, SNAP!
EDIT- NEVERMIND
turns out it only has 1 touch screen just like before. At least this means DS-Liters won't get shafted.
Damn mistranslations leading people to originally believe it had 2 touch screens, oh well, makes me happier, all I miss out on is stuff that is more or less useless to me.
If 25% of the population survived, there is no way we would easily be able to return to our current standard of living very quickly at all. Of course if there were a large density of the population focused in one area, it would make it easier, but it would still be extremely difficult to train the people who survived (if you even could) to be able to do everything that was needed. Everything today relies on so many other things.
25% distributed throughout the world might not be as bad, because if its evenly distributed there might be just enough people everywhere to manage to live on, but it would still require quite a radical change.
Humanity in it current standard of living is quite fragile. With such a globalized world, services and products rely on other services and products halfway around the world. It would be easier however to rebuild because we already have discovered so many things.
Log in to comment