You got ripped off, HARD. Nobody needs 6GB of RAM, i7 are for ricers, and Vista and your videocard, well, suck hard. If you get a 4870 or 4890. Your performance would increase drastically.
[QUOTE="dakan45"] I dissagree because i never cared about choices....i like big open world rpgs. Mass effect was a far inferior kotor, without much rpg elements and i cant say the choices really did anything crazy, but the choices in fallout 2.... well i just found them more important.... stilll bioware and their choices are something i dont care in rpgs.... linear dialogues are the best way to tell a story right, options are just ruining the quality.dakan45
Aren't choices one of the main requirements for an RPG?
Ehhh diablo? leveling up like crazy and hack and slashing everyone? Thas more like my style. Diablo is an action RPG. Which is barely an RPG.
Fallout 3 was a bad bad game,a tad better with mods.This isn't just nostalgia talking though,if i rated it without taking fallout 2 into the equation i would still say its a crappy game....taking fallout 2 into the equation i would say its a crappy crappy game.
Fuzzy_Bear123
come on... better than most rpgs released this era, like mass effect. I haven't played Fallout 3, but I did play Oblivion and Mass Effect was a MUCH better game, you actually made real choices in that game, unlike Oblivion. However I have heard that Fallout 3 is a lot better then Oblivion so I do need to give it a try. But overall I just think that Bioware >>>>>>>>> Bethesda in making REAL RPGs. If you are talking about choice, FO3 destroys ME, the game where choosing a completely opposite dialogue option leads to the same result. Oblivion is still crap, though.
I don't know why this raises so many arguments, the PS3 is an inferior console when it comes to specifications apart from its CPU, but even then, the unnecesarily convoluted architecture doesn't pay well for all the resources wasted in learning it.
Log in to comment