I demand the next GTA protagonist is a Chinese post op female amputee dwarf.

Chinese post op female amputee dwarves are being overlooked in western culture and THIS OVERSIGHT MUST END.

@parttimepunk Great last line. Shame this is the internet and you probably just copy pasted it from a review.

GTA IV had so much missing. It was pretty, yes, but they stripped it back so much compared to San Andreas. IV was one of the most overrated game I've ever played. It was a good game, certainly, but definitely overrated.

Glad to see Rockstar upped their game because Rockstar too awesome to just make "good games".

@rethgryn @iskaroth So angry birds > GTA 5?

@Gabstar-paradis The reviewer identifies their self as a woman. Not that how the reviewer identifies their self should have any bearing on anything.

@filius32 @drummerdickens But I do. Everyone should stop having fun and concentrate on empowerment now please.

I'm convinced. Godfather, Goodfellas, Fight Club and Seven are deeply frustrating movies for their depiction of women as long suffering wives so they are rubbish movies now.

Also, Shawshank Redemption, Usual Suspects, Resevoir Dogs and Gladiator aren't as good as they could have been because there aren't enough women in them.

Movies and games will only be 10/10 worthy when when women are empowered properly.

@pongley I think you might find that there is a possibility that people are using their user vote as a "protest vote" in response to the review.

@Auriken @komuchen @drummerdickens

I don't mean to be rude but you're either not getting my point or you're just trying to be difficult. I'm still not entirely sure what you are trying to get across to me.

Let me put it simply to you. The reviewer has clearly used morality to criticise the game, but she has not done it very well because she touched on one social injustice and chose to ignore a whole bunch more. Therefore I think it is a poor review.

@Auriken @drummerdickens I didn't question the reason why misogyny was brought up at all sir.

I'm questioning why racism and animal abuse wasn't. I completely respect the fact the reviewer has a problem with the misogyny in the game but I don't respect the fact that a review that has used morality to criticise a game has ignored a whole bunch of other social injustices.

The review is inconsistent on that basis.