@vI_DigiTaL_Iv @dtshakuras Oh, so now you are going to reach into the bag and try to discredit Halo and FarCry? Halo and FarCry which have different stories for each version, completely different settings, awesome orchestra music (something that's lacking in many Nintendo games).
You think you know me real well huh? Well fyi, I have never bought a single Madden game because yes I do think they are the same crap even though I'm a NFL fan. Yeah go ahead and defend crappy graphics. If graphics weren't a issue, then why doesn't Nintendo keep the same graphic chip of SNES all the way to the Wii U. Graphics is part of the immersion experience. Its also what helps makes Smash Bros good. They beautiful graphics in Brawl certainly makes it more immersing and attractive than the first Smash.
@vI_DigiTaL_Iv @dtshakuras Ocarina is a classic, I got no beef with that. TP was horrible is a perfect example of how much Nintendo has refused to progress. I got that at launch and then found out no voice acting and was dismayed by extremely crappy graphics. Here we were in the next gen and they still had no voice acting whatsoever when it was already prevalent in the previous gen cycle.
Maybe you haven't played CoD, but MW was definitely a huge leap over CoD3 and BlackOps was definitely different too.
Oh, and real nice of you to call me a CoD fan when I already stated I'm not much of a CoD fan anymore.
I bring up CoD because I was replying to other poster who was comparing CoD and Mario. So if he feels like comparing these two franchises, then he'll get a response.
@19James89 Because Nintendo are rehashing the same games. People can rant all they want about CoD, and I'm not much of a CoD fan anymore, but the fact remains that the material CoD puts out each version is much better and refreshing than a rehashed Mario/Zelda. CoD has a new storyline, new characters, new graphics, new voice acting, new weapons, maps, etc. I'd take a new CoD game over a new Mario game any day.
dtshakuras' comments