dumfart66's forum posts

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
[QUOTE="dumfart66"][QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"][QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"]

[QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"]so i am suppose to listen to a discussion by a main sony developer on why it will win? Damn, i see NO WAY their could be bias there.LiquidMetal14

Clearly you listened to his words :roll:

Your attemping to tell me that a developer that has put its main bulk into sony will not be bias? Wait, i see your logic, i shall make a company and write about how my competitor is better. MY SALES WILL BE AMAZING

He points out fanboy logic like yours, seriously he does. And he re-states the reasons of their independance as a dev. You opinions hold no weight until you listen to it.

He does the same thing as gamespot does, the same thing all you sony fans bashed. Only one difference remains. His company makes money off of sony sales which translates into more sales, gamespot does not make games and as such gains nothing.

Biased occurs when u have a stake in the outcome, telling me that this company has no stake in what sony does it, for a lack of better word, retarded.

All this time you could've taken the 10 minutes to listen to the main portion, while you sifted through your internet. Thats what I'm doing.

You are attempting to tell me a company that has always made sony games is not biased. I want you to see the lack of logic in that. It would be like if Bungie said 10 reasons why the 360 was the best, you all would be up in arms screaming the same thing i am.

You are totally misinformed unless you actually listen to it. It really is a great listen.

You are not seeing WHY he would want it to win, give me capcom saying which is better. I did not listen to gamespot, i do not agree with what this guy says either.  Unless i get some devloper doing both i am NOT going to agree with any of them. I listened, i think he has a stake in it (ie, his companies success) 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
[QUOTE="dumfart66"][QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"]

[QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"]so i am suppose to listen to a discussion by a main sony developer on why it will win? Damn, i see NO WAY their could be bias there.LiquidMetal14

Clearly you listened to his words :roll:

Your attemping to tell me that a developer that has put its main bulk into sony will not be bias? Wait, i see your logic, i shall make a company and write about how my competitor is better. MY SALES WILL BE AMAZING

He points out fanboy logic like yours, seriously he does. And he re-states the reasons of their independance as a dev. You opinions hold no weight until you listen to it.

He does the same thing as gamespot does, the same thing all you sony fans bashed. Only one difference remains. His company makes money off of sony sales which translates into more sales, gamespot does not make games and as such gains nothing.

Biased occurs when u have a stake in the outcome, telling me that this company has no stake in what sony does it, for a lack of better word, retarded.

All this time you could've taken the 10 minutes to listen to the main portion, while you sifted through your internet. Thats what I'm doing.

You are attempting to tell me a company that has always made sony games is not biased. I want you to see the lack of logic in that.  It would be like if Bungie said 10 reasons why the 360 was the best, you all would be up in arms screaming the same thing i am. 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
[QUOTE="dumfart66"]

[QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"][QUOTE="dumfart66"]so i am suppose to listen to a discussion by a main sony developer on why it will win? Damn, i see NO WAY their could be bias there.LiquidMetal14

Clearly you listened to his words :roll:

Your attemping to tell me that a developer that has put its main bulk into sony will not be bias? Wait, i see your logic, i shall make a company and write about how my competitor is better. MY SALES WILL BE AMAZING

He points out fanboy logic like yours, seriously he does. And he re-states the reasons of their independance as a dev. You opinions hold no weight until you listen to it.

He does the same thing as gamespot does, the same thing all you sony fans bashed.  Only one difference remains.  His company makes money off of sony sales which translates into more sales, gamespot does not make games and as such gains nothing.

Biased occurs when u have a stake in the outcome, telling me that this company has no stake in what sony does it, for a lack of better word, retarded. 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts

 

[QUOTE="dumfart66"]so i am suppose to listen to a discussion by a main sony developer on why it will win? Damn, i see NO WAY their could be bias there.LiquidMetal14
Clearly you listened to his words :roll:

Your attemping to tell me that a developer that has put its main bulk into sony will not be bias?  Wait, i see your logic, i shall make a company and write about how my competitor is better.  MY SALES WILL BE AMAZING 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
[QUOTE="SeanDiff"]

Its the best

cell>xenon

RSX=Xenos

PS3 ram>360 ram

MGS4>Halo3

The day Microsoft makes something that doesnt suck is the day they make vacuum cleaners

PurpleBlueGreen

 

Well your first comment is correct. Theoretically the Cell is superior:

  • 115GFLOPS Theoretical Peak Performance for 360 CPU
  • 218GFLOPS Theoretical Peak Performance for PS3 CPU


However the PS3 only uses 6 of it's "SPE'S" for gaming. Each SPE has a peak theoretical performance of 25.6GFLOPS. So it's REAL performance is more like 153.6GFLOPS. Which is only a 33.5% advantage over the Xenon. But this does not include the fact that the Xenon is 10 times easier to program for. Not too mention Sony claimed the PS2 had twice the GFLOPS performance of the first Xbox, but we all know who the performance winner was there.

Second you said "RSX=Xenos", this is so wrong it's not even funny. The 360 GPU has 48 unified pipelines capable of accepting either pixel or vertex shader operations whereas the RSX uses the older dedicated pixel and vertex pipeline architecture. Things get even better when you factor in the Xenos MEMEXPORT ability which opens the door for Xenos to achieve near DX10 functionality. I'm not going to go any further then that, anyone with half a brain knows the Xenos > RSX.

Third you said "PS3 ram>360 ram", I once again have to disagree. The PS3 OS uses up 32MB of the 256MB available GDDR3 memory for the RSX chip and 64MB of the 256MB available XDR memory. So it actually only has 416MB available for games whereas the Xbox 360 has 480MB available for games, due to the fact that it's OS uses so much less memory. A 15% advantage, not too mention that the Xbox 360 has way more memory bandwidth and it's total ram is available to either the cpu or gpu. So really Xbox 360 MB > PS3 MB.

Forth you said "MGS4>Halo3", this is just plain stupid. Neither of these games have been released yet, it's complete speculation at this point. Arguing about that is foolhardy at best.

 

Your arguement is factual and well written, the said thing is the smart posters already know this.  The fanboys will deny it.  Nice attempt tho:( 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
so i am suppose to listen to a discussion by a main sony developer on why it will win?  Damn, i see NO WAY their could be bias there.
Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts

Dont waste your money on Xbox and microsoft. PS3 has the best future. I'll tell yo next year

Chrome-Impala

 

Yes, microsoft is a HORRIBLE company.  That is why it is having profits in its companies divisions and sony is facing losses and recalling EVERY laptop battery.  Talk about the systems, compare the systems, do not embarrass yourself by comparing the companies 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
The core was a good idea, and it was not as stupid as u all claim.  It gives people a bloody choice instead of saying THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT DEAL WITH IT.  For lower income people it can allow them to get the system, play the games, and just use a memory card.  Your rich, you can afford premium, leave the people who take the other choice alone.
Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts

[QUOTE="dumfart66"][QUOTE="Kook18"]I voted 360 even though MS needs to get off their butts & start working on BC for JSRF/Otagi1 +2/GunValkyrie/Shenmue 2 :xKook18


shenmue 2 has bc, i am playing it.

This thread is also pointless, since the fact is the 360 fans will vote 360, the sheep and cows will vote dreamcast out of spite


really? i need to go steal my shenmue 2 from my friend then :o

 

Yup, it is.  Amazing game, we need a shenmue 3 badly 

Avatar image for dumfart66
dumfart66

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dumfart66
Member since 2005 • 295 Posts
I voted 360 even though MS needs to get off their butts & start working on BC for JSRF/Otagi1 +2/GunValkyrie/Shenmue 2 :xKook18


shenmue 2 has bc, i am playing it.

This thread is also pointless, since the fact is the 360 fans will vote 360, the sheep and cows will vote dreamcast out of spite