dxmcat's forum posts

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

@chozofication said:

@Mozelleple112: agreed. Im also 55inch and 5 feet away, native 1080p with Sony Bravia upscaling isn’t bad, but definitely soft and or jagged. Native 4K is night and day.

8k however is a joke.

Nope, not when its 75" 4 feet away.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

@firedrakes said:

to eoten. yeap

dxmcat. tell me what standard are used in 4k gaming????

its just as loose as video. I can't even count the number of "4k blurays" that are upscaled from 2k/2.5k masters, or having effects only in 2k while the rest may or may not be 4k. It all just gets upscaled.

@eoten said:
@firedrakes said:

also should not their is a different between 4k video and gaming.

one has a industry standard and the later has zero rules on it.

The real problem here is that in most games today you have a dynamic camera controlled with a thumbstick. When you move that camera, the background, details, textures, everything gets blurry. The solution to that is higher refresh rates. So unless you're in a game with a fairly stationary camera angle, even 1080P at 120hz is going to look clearer and sharper than 4K at 60. This is irrelevant in television and movies that 4K screens are designed for, but it'll continue to be an issue until hardware can drive 4K at 120fps consistently and stably. The problem is, as developers add more content, better lighting, better shaders, more shadows and reflections, 4K is likely to remain 60fps as games improve with the hardware.

lol wat?

Real 4k or not?

rekt.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

@firedrakes said:

also should not their is a different between 4k video and gaming.

one has a industry standard and the later has zero rules on it.

industry standard? LOL.

not really.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

4k is plenty legitt.

I enjoy every pixel being ~3' from my 55" curved display.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

the only prince of persia :D

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

show me dems sounding the alarm in that timeframe.

anyone? bueller? bueller?

yup.

hindsight finger pointers are worthless.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

LG makes curved reg and ultrawide IPS monitors, some even with 144hz. I have one, but the lower res variety, 2560x1080. 34GK950F is a good one, 1440p, 144hz, but a lil pricey :O

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

washed up attention-hungry mediocre QB being put back into a game for the sake of virtue-signalling is almost worse than in game ads.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

@subspecies_ii said:

So much confusion could so easily have been avoided.

Easy: PS1/2/3/4/5

Confusing: XXXXXXXXXXXX

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

my 8k screen is even 120hz.........jus sayin. :)