If it was true then I would be extremely violent, because well I enjoy killing people IN GAMES, I like killing them slowly and brutally, and have it filled with gore.
However in real life I have never had a fight, never attacked anyone, and am polite to pretty much everyone.
I'm sorry but I don't want to have my intelligence insults by these people who assume that because I play violent games I am going to become a plague on society.
@BloodyAura I disagree, I think that gameplay should come first but graphics are important and can help a great deal with immersion, when I say good graphics I don't mean state of the art, I mean graphics that work with the art style, for example. Minecraft has good graphics but its pretty simple however it can be beautiful at points.
There are some games where graphics help improve gameplay a lot. There are games where the gameplay would just fail if not for the graphics, so this same theory of gameplay vs graphics cannot be applied everywhere.
Actually it doesn.t cost as much as people think. Some people go overkill on their Pc's but no I got mine for £700 and it could have been cheaper as I bought some more expensive less important things. Anyway my Intel CPU was most at £270 and my AMD GPU was £120.
With that I can play BF3 and skyrim on the highest possible graphics at 60+ FPS. I did make a really good choice with the GPU though, it was much better than the others around that price range.
@zpluffy Is that meant to be like a joke?There are plenty of peope, which is kind of evident here that use linux who are gamers, but for that they use Windows because they have to. Enjoy your outdated OS.
@meconate I understand what they mean in the way that I am still going to use Windows until it is fully operational with at least 90% of my games.. though I disagree in that it is definitely worth the development. They should have started this sooner. Now it's up to the distro's and AMD to get their drivers sorted out properly, still a little dodgy on that front.
eddieham13's comments