Maybe you should do your research before you go out and bash some of what is being said?

First off BluRay and 'that chip', are built for each other. BluRay encodes media in H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams, which is an uncompressed video format that allows for true high definition gaming - 1080p. The chip essentially is unable to deal with compressed information, however thanks to BluRay it doesn't have it, and is able to output a visual format that is unable on all other consoles.

Secondly, whats with the holier-than-thou attitude? Last time I checked, there were as many Lemmings calling the Wiimote a gimmick? Amirite? Yeah I am, because if you look at any Wii bashing thread, you can bet there are as many Lemmings as Cows thrashing the Wii.

As for games, well that's opinion based. Someone can say that they think the PS3 lineup trumps the 360 because it has better upcoming games. Oh and it's kinda hard to not to hype a lineup that has games like Metal Gear Solid 4 and Grand Turismo 4, the children of the PS generation.

Seriously, think about it.

elbow2k

K H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams is not a uncompressed format. Is a compressed video format. That fact that is has the name mpeg should of tell u that. H.264/MPEG-4 AVC are decoders and encoders what does decoders and encoders do they compress and decompress video!!!

Next H.264/MPEG-4 AVC is a video stream format which has nothing to do with true High defenition gaming. The PC does not have a Blu-ray or HD-dvd drive and it can do resolutions far greater then True HD 1080p. A video fromat does not dictate if video games are goona be in HD or not. If sony were to release a ps2 with an Blu-ray dirve but everything being the same as the ps2 it wont do HD!!!

Secondly H.264/MPEG-4 AVCcan be output by any device that has the processing capablilities to do it.expecially MPEG-4 AVC which is a sofware codec!!! A software codecis a piece of software that encodes and decodes a signal using a CPU for the processing instead of an decicated MPEG-4 device!!!

[QUOTE="ArisShadows"][QUOTE="hayato_"]

sooo if Im getting this right

I can play PC games through my PS3 to my T.V

Bioshock here I come:D

no need to buy a 360 soonnow, at least not yet ( I still got love )

hayato_

But wouldn't you still have gotten it on PC due the fact you need a PC to do that, so your comment doesn't make sense.

How does it not make sense?

Isn't Bioshock a PC game also? I wouldn't need to buy an 360 yet, I can just buy the game, I willprobably get a 360 down the roadproabably at the next price drop or if I can find a deal

I think you need a 200 and up video card to play bioshock on your computer. Maybe 150 and up.

Splinter Cell - Weak story, lame main character, stupid A.I., boring gameplay, and yawn-inducing stealth. But pretty fun online. :D

Metal Gear Solid - Riveting story, one of the most badass main characters in gaming history, smart A.I., have-it-your-way gameplay, and action-oriented, crazy-ass stealth/action gameplay.

MGS4 vs. Splinter Cell 5? Seriously? Seems like a total no-brainer to me... MGS4 all the way. Splinter Cell games have failed in Single Player campaigns.

princeofshapeir

Since when does MSG have great AI? Im petty sure the AI in splinter cell is much better then MSG.

[QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"]

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

legend26

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

Primary colors is the base of all arts. That your arguement? You kidding mehow u do translate that to any other art let say audio or film. Let me paint a painting with only primary colors and no mixing. LEt use red, blue, green, maybe yellow and black and white. Now how artistic is that? Your answer should is subjective, but it petty dam simple dont you think? See the thing is that mario galaxy art is not new. We seen it before in every single mario game!!!

Now to your other question I started gaming on my NES. Guess which game is my fav game of all time. Super MArio Bros 3 now that game just great. I could never get into 3d mario.

Thats what i was trying to point out, you said it was subjective but argue like everybody else is wrong about the graphics and only fanboys think its great..I was pointing out that even Gamespot editors think its the game with the best art on ANY console even 360 and PS3...

Its subjective yes, but you seem like the only one on the other side of the fence..

fitzokoli

Gamespot said that Mario Galaxy have the best Artistic Graphic. That what they said. If you see the onther graphic award u would see that crysis won that. Now back to my argument Artistic Graphic is subjective much like any art form is. I dont understand how a game that uses primary colors as texture wins the artistic award. But it did. Now in terms of graphics-tech wise Mario Galaxy sucks plain and simple. whena consolebest graphics come from a game that doesnt even beat some of last gen Graphics then there is problem. The TC said mario had great graphics, what he shoudl of said is that is has great artistic graphics. Becuase on the tech side It pales in comparision of the 360 ps3 and pc. That my arguement.

[QUOTE="efd753"][QUOTE="fitzokoli"][QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

Sparticus247

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.

I guess that's subjective too?

It can be when comparing games like GeoW to Uncharted or COD4 or AC but not Mario galaxy to any game on 360 ps3 on the PC. Wii just doesn't have and capability to do anything remotely closesays to Halo 3, or Rachet and Clank.

[QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

legend26

I didnt say the game was bad. Im arguing the point where the TC said mario galaxy has great graphic. I thought is was well known thethe wii is the worst console for graphics. Is the former statement is true then how in the world of logic and reasoning(I know this SW) can any game on the wii have great graphics.

[QUOTE="efd753"]

Mario galaxy has great gameplay. But the graphics are crap to compare to 360 0s3 and pc. There is no denying this. You can't actually believe that Mario has graphics that rival any of the 360 ps3 and pc games this gen. You just can't believe. I don't care so much of a fanboy you are, you can't deny the wii is the worst console for graphics. The hardware is not on the level of the 360 ps3 and pc. If the wii hardware is inferior to the rest of the consoleshow can any game on the wii have great graphics? Mario galaxy is the best looking game on the wii that is it. Is not the best looking game anywhere else.

You may say that the art is great but that subjective. I don't understand how a game that uses primary colors be called artistic. The texture in galaxy has to the most basic texture in any game this Gen. What game has worst texture then this game? OTHER WII GAMES!!! I much rather look at HL2, any sport game. Even RC has better art direction.

I won't deny that Mario Galaxy is a great for some of you. But don't let those fanboy goggles blind you. Mario has WII great graphics that is!

fitzokoli

But SMG won Best Graphics- Artisitic , out of any game this year...

Dont forget it also won Game of the Year...

Are GS editors a bunch of fanboys too..

Like i said artistic is subjective.Im arguing the point where the TC says that Mario Galaxy have great graphics is doesn't.