eggmcmuff's forum posts

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

I wouldn't worry. No way the Wings have another one 'em!

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

Fleury's a wall! The Pens are gonna shut 'em out!

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

I have a 1000 and if I were to upgrade, I'd go with whatever version (2000 or 3000) I could find for the least money. Check Craig's list. That's where I got mine.

as far as differences:

1000 = Original fat

2000 = Slim & has video output so you can connect to a TV.

3000 = Slim & has brighter, improved screen (scan line problems are exaggerated) and a built-in microphone, etc.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#4 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

Operation Flashpoint Elite. It simply doesn't get more realistic or tactical.

Can't help you on GRAW 2, though.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

Good for the Pens. Congratulations. Go get that Cup you left on the table last year. Maybe it'll make 'em fat & happy for next year ;). Crosby earned my respect. Malkin... He's an enigma... I don't know what that guy's ever thinkin' about. The Pens depth showed.

As far as superstition goes, I don't think lucky socks or sitting on my left ass cheek made a difference tonight. The Caps had no legs left and it showed. I was afraid of that going into tonight.

Gonchar playing was a bad omen as was Fleury's early stuff of Ovie.

I guess it's back to being a husband and father. Shucks.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

I'm just too superstitious.blackngold29
I gathered.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#7 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

[QUOTE="eggmcmuff"]

[QUOTE="blackngold29"] You've never seen a five goal period?blackngold29

Well, sure. Not bloody likely from what I see now, though. I get a weird feeling about this game. I can't believe the Hockey gods would let a series so sublime end with such a flaccid outing.

Penguins won game 7 of the 91 finals 8-0. It's still possible to come back and even if Wash scores one or two more times it's gonna be interesting because everybody knows that they have guys that can do it.

The paranoia you are displaying is good form in the face certain victory and I'm sure the Hockey Gods appreciate it, but It'd take one for the ages to send this one to OT. As I said before: Not bloody likely. But I'm open to the idea.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

[QUOTE="eggmcmuff"]

[QUOTE="blackngold29"] Fastest hat trick in NHL history: 21 seconds. This game is far from over.blackngold29

You were saying?

You've never seen a five goal period?

Well, sure. Not bloody likely from what I see now, though. I get a weird feeling about this game. I can't believe the Hockey gods would let a series so sublime end with such a flaccid outing.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

O.K. There's a little bit of life.

Avatar image for eggmcmuff
eggmcmuff

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

47

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 eggmcmuff
Member since 2006 • 665 Posts

Malkin jumped out of the way, that'll be a classic hit.blackngold29
When it rains, it pours.