[QUOTE="faisal123456"]

So is the extended death count so.. back on topic?

The_Ish

You're the one who bought it up to use as a point. :|

Ok i accept ownage back on topic?

it is claimed that the Isreal is commiting ethnic cleansing on the palistine people.

link

link2

[QUOTE="faisal123456"]

agian i said looting was a war crime not a terroristic act

The_Ish

Then it's irrelevant to your own thread.

So is the extended death count so.. back on topic?

[QUOTE="faisal123456"]

but it is a war crime which i was saying earlier that the us does not try for war crimes. How do you miss someone just giving away aprox 10 kj of solid gold in forms of weapons. Which saddam has been seen with many times.

The_Ish

ter·ror·ism[ter-uh-riz-uhm]

–noun

You are calling the US terrorists for "looting". Looting isn't terrorism. It isn't an act that is meant to resist a government, or to coerce it.

agian i said looting was a war crime not a terroristic act

What shakes me is the lack of one sound, unifying, globally accepted fact for going to war against Iraq. Al Queda? **** yes. Eradicate them. But Iraq? a government? Saddam all of a sudden? Suddenly Iraq is the threat, with the yellow cake uranium, and undeniable proof from Cheney, which turned out to be quite deniable? There's a gap in logic. I'm sure if Saddam was still in place, he wouldn't be helping matters, but after the lies and claims of WMD, this can't be the justification behind it all. Was it bad intelligence? Preemptive? Some one explain this to me.McMurmur

It was based on Operation Iraqi Liberation

[QUOTE="faisal123456"]What about Saddam's solid gold AK 47 and Gold Draganuv. That would be looting which is a war crime. As well the US just gave away the ak to the Austrailians.The_Ish

"Looting" is not a terrorist attack.

but it is a war crime which i was saying earlier that the us does not try for war crimes. How do you miss someone just giving away aprox 10 kj of solid gold in forms of weapons. Which saddam has been seen with many times.

[QUOTE="faisal123456"]

ok sorry i didnt read it but heres one that looks like the right one

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

The_Ish

It still doesn't support your claim that the US has killed more people than Saddam. The site itself says the death count hasn't broken 100,000, and not all of them (read: almost all of them after 2003) are due to the US.

Actually the count started in 2003. The US started a war over 3000 infidels. there have been 600 000 deaths caused by sadam over a period of 32 years. Saddam rate= 18 750 per year

US rate = 19000

my original claim was based on the link which i forgot to read over. It still shows that US is killing civilians at a faster rate

Us rate=