fallenchicken's forum posts

  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

It had nothing to do with the GTA arguement, it had to do with developers in general. Read what I quoted properly.EquiIibrium

my bad didn't notice what you quoted.

Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

So Mario should be a more realistic game now?

You cant use a game that has nothing to do with gta4 as a example to help your argument.

Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

I still like GTA.

Rockstar made a new aproach for GTA:IV and tried to make the game more realistic, which is good thing to me, cause I don't like to play the same type of game over and over again. Rockstar tried to make it a little different PEOPLE!

Now if they made GTA:IV more sandbox-ish, people would start complaining about how they got bored because its the same GTA game, A.K.A SANDBOX

BOTTOM LINE: Rockstar tried to give it fresh by trying out new things, I swear people are so stupid......

And as for the driving, its way better than Gta: san andreas, where you start out at 100 MPH in 2 seconds......more realistic in GTA:IV

And I love GTA:IV

hobo290

I don't think rockstar wants to be that kind of company either. I remember them saying a while back that they dont wanna be the company that releases the same game every year.

Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

fallenchicken, I've played this game for over 17 hours and it's ok.mitu123

ok.

Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts
I really am starting to think some people don't have big enough attention spans to play gta4. Sure theres not alot of blowing stuff up in the first 5 minutes but its really good if you can focus and get into it.
Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts
I like what paladin king said, but I do think the multiplayer was great. Best sandbox multiplayer ever unless im forgetting something and no im not forgetting saints row.
Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

I don't know why people disliked gta4 either. They wanted crazy fun and that is fine i like that to, but them disliking gta4 is on them not on the game. They cant appreciate the story, the driving, the shooting(hand to hand wasn't as good as San Andreas but it wasn't horrible). I know people expected a different game from san andreas so they ended up judging a game on something it wasn't. If you cant appreciate or just don't like gta4 that's fine, but I don't understand how you can say it sucks.

BTW: I like saints row and own the 2nd one.

Avatar image for fallenchicken
fallenchicken

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 fallenchicken
Member since 2008 • 486 Posts

I agree with all the ups you said about mass effect (charector interaction ext.). I just went into it expecting it to be as good as kotor and it wasn't. Oblivion why charector interaction was non exsistant(fallout 3 looks alot better in that department) was still huge, tons of quests and places to explore. When the onlything really worth playing in mass effect was the main quest.

BTW This does not mean I am bashing Mass effect

  • 37 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4